Skip to content
56

huel

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 50Growth 15Conversion 33Competition 71Returns 100Price range 83Avg price 95Brand share 9Review moat 90Quality gap 76

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€26.30

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Great191.7

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Great€6.71–€61.77

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good42%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay€272K

€272K/yr · 390K searches

Conversion

Okay2.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-20.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad96%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 42% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

7 rising

Sellers

20

Top-5 brand share

96%

Open market

2%

  • YFood76%
  • J*st Food9%
  • Alpro6%
  • HiPP3%
  • Layenberger3%
  • eatyx2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (1 brand, 2%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€11K8%€22K12%€33K16%€43K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 37 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -20.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geschmack insgesamt44%

“Yummy”

Geschmack13%

“Super Geschmack”

Ernährungs Gehalt6%

“Mit 20 g Protein pro 500 ml Flasche sättigt sie richtig gut und liefert nebenbei 26 Vitamine und Mineralstoffe plus Ballaststoffe und Omega-3”

Qualität insgesamt5%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Super Preis”

Gesundheitliche Vorteile – insgesamt3%

“Mir hilft yfood sehr”

Süße3%

“Heavenly hazelnut”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Praktisch”

Textur/Konsistenz – insgesamt1%

“Auch die Konsistenz ist gut gelungen”

Vegan/Biologisch1%

“Veganer Food”

What buyers complain about

Geschmack insgesamt24%

“schmeckt nicht wie der drink”

Geschmack8%

“Geschmack 0/10”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“etwas teuer”

Süße7%

“Absolut zu süss”

Textur/Konsistenz – insgesamt3%

“Konsistenz ekelhaft”

Künstliche Süßstoffe3%

“Endlich ein shake der nicht komplett nach Süßstoff schmeckt”

Allergien3%

“viele Lebensmittel Allergien / Laktose Intoleranz & Süssstoffallergie”

Ernährungs Gehalt3%

“enthält leider nicht besonders viel Protein.”

Dicke2%

“Am Anfang wirkt der Drink dann eher dünn”

Säureregulator/Linderung von Magenschmerzen2%

“Bauchschmerzen”

Top return reasons

Geschmack insgesamt100%