Skip to content
66

hämorrhoiden salbe

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 88Growth 17Conversion 90Competition 40Returns 99Price range 74Avg price 80Brand share 70Review moat 50Quality gap 80

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great10.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Great€1.6M

€1.6M/yr · 876K searches

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great€17.08

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€7.64–€36.26

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good63%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Good1,488.62

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay61%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Bad-15.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 61% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 rising

Sellers

46

Top-5 brand share

63%

Open market

31%

  • Medolin21%
  • Evolsin18%
  • Azulenal11%
  • SOS8%
  • POSTERISAN6%
  • Apotheker's Best6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€160K20%€321K30%€481K40%€641K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 21 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -15.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt15%

“super Produkt”

Allergien8%

“Für leichte Reizungen sicher in Ordnung”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%

“Einfache Handhabung”

Effizienz8%

“Wirkt super”

Komfort insgesamt6%

“Sehr angenehmes und wirksames Gel”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Erfüllt seinen Zweck”

Linderung von Juckreiz4%

“Lindert Juckreiz, praktische Einwegtuben, teurer Preis”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Preis Leistung voll ok”

Hautgesundheit3%

“und beruhigt die Haut”

Dosierung3%

“Leicht zu dosieren”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt36%

“Null Wirkung”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis21%

“Geld verschwendung”

Allergien7%

“Allergisch gegen Wollwachs”

Geruch3%

“stinkt etwas”

Dosierung2%

“Hilfe zur Dosierung wäre wünschenswert”

Entflammbar2%

“Bei mir brennt die Salbe”

Qualität insgesamt2%

“Müll”

Ethischer Handel/Fairer Handel2%

“Betrug”

Entzündung2%

“Es dauert damit deutlich länger die Entzündung bzw die Schwellung in den Griff zu bekommen”

Einfache Reinigung2%

“Schmiert total, man hat Mühe die Hände wieder sauber zu bekommen”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt49%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt14%
Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt11%
Produktzustand6%
Farbe3%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%
Entflammbar3%
Fleckenbeständigkeit3%
Hautgesundheit3%
Auslaufsicher3%