Skip to content
53

getrocknete pilze

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but soft demand (-33.3% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 21Growth 8Conversion 92Competition 57Returns 100Price range 61Avg price 62Brand share 50Review moat 91Quality gap 52

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great11.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Great182.19

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Good€13.48

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€1.16–€36.79

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good51%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Good75%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Bad€84K

€84K/yr · 56K searches

Growth

Bad-33.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 51% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

14 falling

Sellers

26

Top-5 brand share

75%

Open market

20%

  • Diamond29%
  • Bamboo Garden25%
  • BIO LEIS in harmony with nature7%
  • HoolySeek7%
  • Kotanyi6%
  • The Great Canadian Tea5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€8K20%€17K30%€25K40%€33K1101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 27 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 74 weeks — -33.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KPrime Day '25Spike '25Holiday '25MarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Jan, Oct, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt35%

“Super Produkt”

Geschmack insgesamt19%

“Risotto schmeckt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis12%

“Super Preis Leistung”

Geschmack10%

“Aromatische,”

Geruch8%

“Intensives Aroma und top Qualität”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Produkt entspricht unserer Erwartung,sehr”

Gesamtgröße1%

“Passt”

Pulverisiert/zerbröselt1%

“Okay schön pulverig”

Textur/Konsistenz – insgesamt1%

“Tolle Konsistenz”

Kochanleitung1%

“Keine langen Quell- und Kochzeiten”

What buyers complain about

Geschmack17%

“Fehlender Geschmack in der Souce”

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Müll”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt10%

“Die Angaben sind irreführend”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“dafür zu teuer”

Geruch8%

“Leider zu wenig Aroma”

Gesamtgröße5%

“sind manche davon echt riesig. Mega”

Abgestanden/verfault/verwöhnt5%

“Sind irgendwie „ranzig“.”

Kochanleitung4%

“Nicht kochen”

Hartes Gefühl4%

“sind irgendwie „ranzig“.”

Geschmack insgesamt3%

“auch nach dem Kochen ungenießbar schmeckt wie Gummi”