Skip to content
57

gaming booster

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 22Growth 22Conversion 23Competition 85Returns 100Price range 83Avg price 95Brand share 44Review moat 85Quality gap 80

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€24.06

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great30%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Review moat

Great293.27

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Great€2.88–€82.11

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay79%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Bad1.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€88K

€88K/yr · 200K searches

Growth

Bad-6.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (30% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

19 rising

Sellers

54

Top-5 brand share

79%

Open market

18%

  • GAMERS ONLY28%
  • LOOT22%
  • Up-Grade Energy Booster16%
  • natural elements10%
  • GAME ATTACK3%
  • Warrior3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (13 brands, 18%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€2K4%€4K6%€5K8%€7K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)3 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 67 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -6.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
35K25KHoliday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul, Aug, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geschmack insgesamt41%

“tasty”

Geschmack13%

“Super Geschmack”

Energieniveau7%

“Energy”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Obviously, this is something to expect from the cheapest offer out there”

Qualität insgesamt5%

“Super Produkt”

Süße4%

“und das bei Null Zucker”

Löslichkeit2%

“Löst sich perfekt auf”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Erfüllt seinen Zweck”

Gesamtgröße1%

“Fitter”

Koffeingehalt1%

“das Koffein wirkt einwandfrei.”

What buyers complain about

Geschmack insgesamt28%

“Schmeckt absolut nicht”

Geschmack13%

“Geschmack gewöhnungsbedürftig”

Künstliche Süßstoffe7%

“Schmeckt irgendwie nach Chemischer Frucht ohne Zucker, ekelhaft”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Komplettes geld in Ausfluss”

Süße4%

“Anfangs lecker, auf Dauer etwas zu süß”

Geruch2%

“jede Sorte riecht”

Funktionalität insgesamt2%

“Bringt absolut gar nichts”

Qualität insgesamt2%

“Da gibt es deutlich bessere Produkte”

Abgestanden/verfault/verwöhnt1%

“Eckelhaft”

Ernährungs Gehalt1%

“Not a very healthy mix”