Skip to content
56

fresubin

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 95Growth 21Conversion 79Competition 34Returns 100Price range 95Avg price 94Brand share 0Review moat 74Quality gap 23

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Incredible€2.2M

€2.2M/yr · 596K searches

Price range

Incredible€22.46–€56.19

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Great€46.65

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Great8.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good558.44

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay65%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-7.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 65% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

3 flat

Sellers

27

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Fresubin42%
  • Fresenius33%
  • RWmedical Ihr Partner im Beschaffungsprozess25%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€223K20%€446K30%€669K40%€892K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 16 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -7.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
25K15KHoliday '24Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geschmack insgesamt28%

“Schmeckt super”

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Bestes Produkt”

Ernährungs Gehalt14%

“Gute Nahrungsergänzung”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“Top Preis-Leistung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“entspricht den Erwartungen”

Geschmack7%

“gnaz gut”

Energieniveau3%

“Der Energy Drink ist sehr sättigen”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Schnell u. unkompliziert”

Gesamtgröße1%

“es passt”

Vitamin1%

“Sie enthalten alle wichtigen Vitamine, Mineralstoffe und Nährstoffe, die ein geschwächter Körper braucht – und das in einer kompakten, leicht trinkbaren Form”

What buyers complain about

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt25%

“Reklamation”

Geschmack21%

“schlechteste Geschmacksrichtung doppelt eingepackt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis17%

“Geld rausgeschmissen”

Süße13%

“Zu süß”

Künstliche Süßstoffe4%

“Geschmack extrem künstlich”

Mischung/Verhältnis4%

“Gutes Nahrungsergänzungsmittel, allerdings schlechtes Mischverhältnis”

Qualität insgesamt2%

“Aber die ganze Sendung sollte diese Qualitätsstufe haben”

Top return reasons

Gewichtsverlust20%
Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt20%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt20%
Funktionalität insgesamt20%
Zertifizierungen20%