Skip to content
52

flohsamenschalen bio

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but soft demand (-4.3% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 40Growth 23Conversion 97Competition 39Returns 100Price range 58Avg price 82Brand share 52Review moat 53Quality gap 24

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible15.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great€17.69

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€5.57–€28.28

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good1,388.63

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good74%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay€203K

€203K/yr · 73K searches

Competition

Okay61%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-4.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 61% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

13 falling

Sellers

22

Top-5 brand share

74%

Open market

21%

  • Alnatura31%
  • GREAT VITA13%
  • Vita2You13%
  • Green Essence8%
  • vom-Achterhof8%
  • D&O Nature Products5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€20K20%€41K30%€61K40%€81K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 16 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -4.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt46%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis11%

“Preis Leistung super”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt9%

“Produkt ist so, wie beworben und bestellt”

Vegan/Biologisch5%

“Bio Qualität”

Reguliert die Verdauung5%

“schalen für die gute verdauung”

Ernährungs Gehalt3%

“Ein richtiges Superfood für den Darm”

Geschmack insgesamt3%

“lecker”

Löslichkeit2%

“Lassen sich easy in Joghurt, Smoothies oder Müsli mischen, quellen gut auf und die Qualität passt”

Backen2%

“auch zum Backen sind sie super”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“gut bekömmlich”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt10%

“Schlechte Qualität ohne Rückgabemöglichkeit”

Geschmack insgesamt9%

“Schmecken ekelhaft”

Löslichkeit8%

“Ist nicht lösbar wie Flohsamenschalen”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit7%

“Nicht zu verwenden”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Überteuert”

Geruch6%

“chemischer Geruch”

Ernährungs Gehalt4%

“auf dem Etikett steht 19 kcal pro 100g, dies kann er nicht sein es müsste knapp 200 kcal sein.”

Geschmack3%

“sind geschmacksneutral”

Dicke3%

“Etwas gröber als ich es sonst kenne”

Reguliert die Verdauung3%

“Stuhlgang”