Skip to content
55

fingerschiene

Worth a look

Shows no brand lock-in (top 5 brands take 48% of clicks), but prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($3.40–$16.48) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 35Growth 27Conversion 61Competition 76Returns 59Price range 11Avg price 21Brand share 87Review moat 69Quality gap 82

Brand share

Great48%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Great39%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Review moat

Good738.83

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Good5.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Good2.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Okay€169K

€169K/yr · 423K searches

Growth

Okay+1.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Bad€7.49

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Bad€3.40–€16.48

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (39% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

27 falling

Sellers

35

Top-5 brand share

48%

Open market

46%

  • ACWOO13%
  • supregear10%
  • ALTcompluser9%
  • DALLAR8%
  • Sopito8%
  • Echify7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€5K6%€10K9%€15K12%€20K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 41 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +1.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KSepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße19%

“Passt perfekt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%

“Hält was sie verspricht”

Komfort insgesamt10%

“bequem”

Qualität insgesamt9%

“Super Qualität”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit9%

“Leichte Handhabung”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Beste Preis Leistung”

Griff8%

“Gut zur Stabilisierung eines Fingers geeignet”

Effizienz3%

“Funktioniert super”

Stärke3%

“Fingerschiene,sehr stabil”

Einstellbarkeit/Drehbarkeit/lehnend3%

“Allein die flexiblen Einstellungsmöglichkeiten”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße22%

“Für normale Finger völlig ungeeignet”

Griff15%

“Rutsch dauernd, da nicht durchdachte Befestigung an der Hand”

Geruch8%

“Stinkt unerträglich”

Komfort insgesamt5%

“unbequem”

Haltbarkeit5%

“Klett hält aber gerade einmal 2-3 Tage,danach löst er sich ständig”

Steifheit4%

“Finger wird sonst zu steif und unbeweglich”

Materialqualität4%

“Schlechtes Material”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Unbrauchbar”

Flexibilität3%

“bocksteif und unbrauchbar”

Stärke2%

“Eine Schiene alleine zu schwach”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße72%
Funktionalität insgesamt5%
Griff4%
Komfort insgesamt3%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Geruch2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%
Gelenkschmerzen1%
Defekt Material/Teile1%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit1%