Skip to content
55

fieberthermometer kontaktlos

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (9.4% search→purchase), but soft demand (-65.3% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 66Growth 0Conversion 85Competition 59Returns 77Price range 81Avg price 81Brand share 34Review moat 22Quality gap 76

Conversion

Great9.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great€17.56

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€10.28–€37.38

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Returns

Great1.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Good€640K

€640K/yr · 386K searches

Competition

Good49%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay85%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Bad10,434.8

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-65.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 49% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

10 flat

Sellers

82

Top-5 brand share

85%

Open market

8%

  • Braun30%
  • Viproud21%
  • Berrcom18%
  • HIMMELSHAUCH MEDICAL8%
  • femometer7%
  • hetaida7%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 8%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€32K10%€64K15%€96K20%€128K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 20 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -65.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KPrime Day '24Spike '24Black Friday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Benutzerfreundlichkeit30%

“Super Handhabung & Features”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Super Produkt”

Temperaturkontrolle10%

“Bester Thermometer”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Hält was er verspricht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Super Preis - Leistung,”

Genauigkeit insgesamt6%

“Genaues Fieberthermometer”

Effizienz5%

“Super funktionell”

Fieberlinderung2%

“Fiebermessung”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Passt”

Gesamt anzeigen1%

“+ Großes, gut ablesbares Display”

What buyers complain about

Messung / Ablesegenauigkeit25%

“Unzuverlässig”

Funktionalität insgesamt9%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Genauigkeit insgesamt8%

“Unzuverlässig”

Temperaturkontrolle8%

“Misst falsche Temperatur”

Qualität insgesamt6%

“ein klares Qualitätsproblem”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%

“Komplett unbrauchbar”

Fieberlinderung6%

“Vor allem bei Fieber misst es super ungenau,”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Schade um das Geld”

Haltbarkeit5%

“Nach einem Jahr Defekt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Das wirkt irreführend”

Top return reasons

Messung / Ablesegenauigkeit23%
Funktionalität insgesamt20%
Heizung7%
Produktzustand7%
Genauigkeit insgesamt7%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
Temperaturkontrolle5%
Gesamtgröße3%
Gesamt anzeigen3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%