Skip to content
54

feuchtes toilettenpapier

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 93% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 85Growth 21Conversion 96Competition 49Returns 100Price range 38Avg price 63Brand share 16Review moat 48Quality gap 25

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible13.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Great€1.4M

€1.4M/yr · 757K searches

Avg price

Good€13.54

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Okay55%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Okay1,698.65

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Okay€0.87–€23.80

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-8.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad93%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 55% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

9 flat

Sellers

43

Top-5 brand share

93%

Open market

4%

  • Tempo39%
  • Cottonelle24%
  • by Amazon24%
  • Gut & Günstig4%
  • OLA3%
  • Hakle2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (3 brands, 4%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€70K10%€141K15%€211K20%€282K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 23 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -8.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
30K20KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt21%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis17%

“spart Geld”

Geruch15%

“Alles bestens angenehme Geruch”

Einfache Reinigung8%

“Nur Faktu Clean ist besser”

Weiches Gefühl5%

“Angenehm weich”

Komfort insgesamt5%

“Angenehm und zuverlässig”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Produkt wie beschrieben”

Feucht/Trocken4%

“Das Beste feuchte Toilettenpapier”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Super anzuwenden”

What buyers complain about

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis13%

“Preis- Leistung stimmt nicht”

Qualität insgesamt11%

“misserable Qualität”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit9%

“Einfach unpraktikabel”

Geruch7%

“riechen nach garnichts - sehr schade”

Gesamtgröße6%

“Sizen aber seeehr eng gestopft in ihrer Packung, sodass man zunächst einen ganzen Batzen rauszieht”

Dicke6%

“Schon beim Herausziehen reißt das zu dünne Material”

Haltbarkeit6%

“Leider gehen die ersten Tücher immer kaputt”

Feucht/Trocken5%

“Diesmal diese Sorte genommen - ok sind feucht”

Einfache Reinigung5%

“Nur zum heraus nehmen öfter etwas ungut”

Stärke4%

“Zu dünn”

Top return reasons

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis15%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt15%
Geruch15%
Feucht/Trocken11%
Qualität insgesamt11%
Gesamtgröße5%
Dünn5%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%
Abgabemechanismus3%
Wasserbeständigkeit3%