Skip to content
57

fersensporn einlagen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.4%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 47Growth 29Conversion 48Competition 65Returns 88Price range 44Avg price 56Brand share 73Review moat 34Quality gap 79

Returns

Great1.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Good61%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good46%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Avg price

Good€12.78

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Okay3.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Okay€251K

€251K/yr · 512K searches

Price range

Okay€5.91–€22.24

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay3,104.22

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Okay+2.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 46% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

21 falling

Sellers

42

Top-5 brand share

61%

Open market

33%

  • FERSENFREUND18%
  • SULPO17%
  • Podcase9%
  • FLEXIFEET9%
  • VALSOLE8%
  • Bukihome6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€10K8%€20K12%€30K16%€40K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 36 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +2.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KSepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Komfort insgesamt14%

“Super bequem”

Gesamtgröße14%

“Passt”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Produkt super”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit7%

“Total easy anzuwenden vor dem Tv oder im Büro”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Genau das macht das Produkt”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit5%

“haften super.”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Super zu dem Preis”

Effizienz3%

“Funktioniert”

Kissen3%

“Das Fersenkissen tut was es soll”

Schmerzlinderung – insgesamt3%

“hilft bei Fußermüdung”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße12%

“passt nicht”

Schmerzlinderung – insgesamt10%

“Schmerzen”

Haltbarkeit9%

“Schlechte Haltbarkeit”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit8%

“Kleber hält kaum”

Komfort insgesamt6%

“unbequem”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“etwas teuer”

Funktionalität insgesamt5%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Dicke5%

“Dünn”

Qualität insgesamt3%

“Insgesamt gesehen,für mich nicht ideal”

Griff3%

“Verrutschen”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße47%
Funktionalität insgesamt9%
Komfort insgesamt5%
Füße fit5%
Hartes Gefühl4%
Schmerzlinderung – insgesamt4%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit2%
Gelenkschmerzen2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%