Skip to content
55

feigwarzen entfernen intimbereich

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but a small market ($57K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 14Growth 22Conversion 59Competition 43Returns 99Price range 81Avg price 77Brand share 67Review moat 58Quality gap 96

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Incredible3.9★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Great€9.19–€41.98

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Great€15.60

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Good65%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Good5.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good1,191.11

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay59%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Bad-5.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad€57K

€57K/yr · 73K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 59% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 rising

Sellers

43

Top-5 brand share

65%

Open market

31%

  • Duofilm34%
  • MagiSel11%
  • Prontomed11%
  • citrimoldin5%
  • Evolsin5%
  • Medolin5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€6K20%€11K30%€17K40%€23K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 19 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 9 weeks — -5.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K750Spike '26May '26May '26May '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jul '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Effizienz19%

“Funktioniert”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit19%

“Das Handling ist leicht verständlich”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Bestes Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt12%

“Produkt wie beschrieben alles ok”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Hat sich gelohnt”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung4%

“Genau die Gebrauchsanweisung beachten”

Einfache Anwendung3%

“Sehr empfehlenswert auch Dank des Applikators”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Passt”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Sie halten und sind sehr gut nutzbar”

Stärke2%

“Effizient”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt22%

“Wirkt nicht”

Schmerzlinderung – insgesamt10%

“schwarz, fängt an zu schmerzen”

Haltbarkeit10%

“Fallen nach 4-5 Tagen ab”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%

“Komplizierte Anwendung”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Geldverschwendung”

Qualität insgesamt5%

“Flop”

Allergien4%

“Hautreizung”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Stielwarze zu klein/dünn anscheinend”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Hält nicht was es verspricht”

Montage/Installation2%

“Der Zusammenbau ist unmöglich”

Top return reasons

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis100%