Skip to content
57

enthaarungsspray

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 70Growth 60Conversion 46Competition 11Returns 99Price range 83Avg price 95Brand share 0Review moat 62Quality gap 98

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Incredible3.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Incredible€31.23

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€6.42–€66.06

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good€741K

€741K/yr · 650K searches

Review moat

Good1,029.4

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Good+35.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Okay3.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Bad87%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 87% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

3 flat

Sellers

20

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Belle Body91%
  • Veet5%
  • Depilan4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%15%€111K30%€222K45%€334K60%€445K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 10 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +35.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
20K15KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 11.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt14%

“Hält was sie verspricht”

Geruch10%

“Der Geruch ist ganz ok”

Effizienz8%

“Funktioniert,”

Haarentfernung5%

“Bisher bestes Enthaarungsprodukt, das ich getestet habe”

Weiches Gefühl4%

“Die Haut fühlt sich Butter zart an”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Super und leicht zu handhaben”

Haarwachstum4%

“Haarentvernung”

Allergien4%

“Aber keine Irritationen trotz empfindlicher Haut”

Einfache Anwendung3%

“einfach anzuwenden”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt15%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Geruch13%

“es stinkt abartig.”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Sehr teurer Müll”

Allergien8%

“Bei mir hat es Haut Irritation hervorgerufen”

Qualität insgesamt6%

“Müll”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“nicht ergiebig”

Haarverwandt4%

“dünneres Nachwachsen der Behaarung.”

Sprachprobleme3%

“Ohne deutsche Beschreibung”

schädigen/verbrennen Haare3%

“Im Anschluss brennt die Creme sehr heftig”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit2%

“Schaum haftet schlecht Ergebnis ok”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt50%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%
Geruch7%
Haarverwandt4%
schädigen/verbrennen Haare4%
Sprachprobleme4%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung2%
Produktzustand2%