Skip to content
54

entgiftungskur

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but soft demand (-41.1% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 22Growth 4Conversion 30Competition 64Returns 100Price range 86Avg price 93Brand share 83Review moat 47Quality gap 79

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€22.28

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€8.44–€68.42

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Great52%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good47%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Okay1,823.79

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Okay2.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€89K

€89K/yr · 165K searches

Growth

Bad-41.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 47% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

26 rising

Sellers

47

Top-5 brand share

52%

Open market

41%

  • Pflarosa14%
  • natural elements11%
  • ProFuel11%
  • Laboratoires Nutrimea9%
  • NATURTREU7%
  • Nature's Finest by Nutrisslim7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€3K6%€5K9%€8K12%€11K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 38 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 58 weeks — -41.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Jan, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt19%

“Super Produkt”

Geschmack insgesamt13%

“Yummy”

Reguliert die Verdauung6%

“Verdauung tut es gut”

Geschmack6%

“Geschmackvoll”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Hält sein Versprechen”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Bester Preis”

Effizienz4%

“Efficient”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt3%

“Super Inhaltsstoffe, gleiche wie bei einem bekannten Influenzer Produkt”

Ernährungs Gehalt2%

“Top Probiotika”

Löslichkeit2%

“lässt sich perfekt in Smoothies oder Wasser einrühren.”

What buyers complain about

Geschmack insgesamt13%

“schmeckt aber bitter.”

Funktionalität insgesamt12%

“Null Effekt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Geldverschwendung”

Geschmack5%

“Geschmacksinn verloren ect pp.”

Säureregulator/Linderung von Magenschmerzen5%

“Durchfall ohne Ende”

Löslichkeit5%

“Löst sich nicht gut auf”

Nebenwirkungen4%

“Es scheint also, dass dieses Medikament bei mir nicht mehr so gut wirkt”

Dosierung3%

“Unterdosiert”

Reguliert die Verdauung3%

“Sodbrennen”

Geruch2%

“Tabletten stinken”

Top return reasons

Haftung/Klebrigkeit27%
Funktionalität insgesamt18%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt18%
Produktzustand9%
Geschmack9%
Geschmack insgesamt9%
Defekt Material/Teile9%