Skip to content
68

eaa

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 74Growth 16Conversion 74Competition 69Returns 100Price range 95Avg price 94Brand share 52Review moat 87Quality gap 73

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Incredible€17.62–€27.56

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Great€22.68

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Great260.9

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good€822K

€822K/yr · 528K searches

Conversion

Good6.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good44%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good74%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-17.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 44% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

47

Top-5 brand share

74%

Open market

20%

  • ESN25%
  • Gym Nutrition19%
  • natural elements14%
  • GEN GERMAN ELITE NUTRITION8%
  • IronMaxx7%
  • OLIMP SPORT NUTRITION6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€41K10%€82K15%€123K20%€164K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 39 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -17.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geschmack insgesamt23%

“Schmeckt”

Geschmack13%

“Super geschmack”

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Super Produkt”

Löslichkeit7%

“Solides EAA-Pulver mit guter Löslichkeit”

Ernährungs Gehalt6%

“(Ideal für Vegetarier)”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Preis vernünftig”

Süße3%

“Sehr süßlich fruchtiges Aroma”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt3%

“Super Produkt, alles 9 Essentiellen Aminosäuren enthalten, was will man mehr, Preis auch o. k.”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Hält was es verspricht”

Dosierung2%

“Die Dosierung pro Portion ist klar definiert”

What buyers complain about

Geschmack insgesamt22%

“Schmeckt grausam”

Geschmack11%

“Es staubt etwas und schmeckt etwas bitter”

Süße7%

“Süße ist kaum vorhanden”

Bitter5%

“bitter”

Künstliche Süßstoffe5%

“sehr süß was vermutlich am enthaltenen Süßungsmittel Stevia liegt.”

Löslichkeit4%

“löst sich nicht wirklich gut auf”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Schade um das Geld”

Verdünnt/wässrig2%

“Selbst sehr verdünnt mit Wasser”

Sauer2%

“etwas sauer am Ende”

Qualität insgesamt2%

“insgesamt hat mich das Produkt nicht überzeugt.”

Top return reasons

Geschmack100%