Skip to content
48

drogentest

Skip it

A concentrated shelf (top 5 take 81% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 51Growth 21Conversion 95Competition 15Returns 99Price range 28Avg price 47Brand share 24Review moat 37Quality gap 70

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible12.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Good€306K

€306K/yr · 219K searches

Avg price

Okay€11.58

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,776.17

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Okay€7.06–€18.02

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Bad91%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Growth

Bad-7.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Bad81%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Competition

The top 5 products capture 81% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

9 falling

Sellers

8

Top-5 brand share

91%

Open market

7%

  • Prime Screen34%
  • ACCUDOCTOR Check test24%
  • BMUT20%
  • One Step9%
  • Easy@Home4%
  • August Engelhardt3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (3 brands, 7%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€31K20%€61K30%€92K40%€122K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 12 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -7.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K4KSepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt28%

“So soll es sein”

Genauigkeit insgesamt23%

“Aussagekräftige Tests”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis22%

“fairer Preis”

Effizienz13%

“Tests funktionieren gut”

Gesamtgröße6%

“Passt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Die Handhabung ist sehr einfach”

What buyers complain about

Genauigkeit insgesamt21%

“Man sieht überhaupt keine max Grenze”

Funktionalität insgesamt17%

“Es hat nur ein einziger Test funktioniert ärgerlich”

Qualität insgesamt15%

“Müll”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis13%

“Geldverschwendung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Falsches Produkt oder falsche Beschreibung”

Nebenwirkungen8%

“Zeigte bei Kokain Konsumenten negativ Ergebnis”

Farbe8%

“Ich würde vermuten in weiteren 1-2-3 Wochen dürfte der Strich dann dunkler werden”

Spannung/Angst4%

“Gab total Stress bei uns deshalb”

Top return reasons

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt21%
Zertifizierungen14%
Genauigkeit insgesamt14%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt14%
Funktionalität insgesamt11%
Messung / Ablesegenauigkeit7%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%
Materialqualität4%
Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt4%
Qualität insgesamt4%