Skip to content
39

dmso augentropfen

Skip it

Brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 17Growth 20Conversion 95Competition 3Returns 99Price range 66Avg price 76Brand share 0Review moat 90Quality gap 24

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great11.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Great195.5

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Great€15.30

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€13.89–€17.13

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-9.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad€66K

€66K/yr · 36K searches

Competition

Bad97%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 97% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

5 flat

Sellers

6

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • AuraVerde33%
  • X130%
  • ANCEVIA22%
  • vitalundfitmit10012%
  • Kopp, Rottenburg3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€7K20%€13K30%€20K40%€26K101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 6 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -9.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K600Black Friday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Top Produkt, macht einen sehr guten Eindruck”

Effizienz12%

“Sehr gut und wirkungsvoll”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit10%

“Anwendung sehr gut”

Allergien9%

“Hilft bei Allergie”

Augenhygiene8%

“Linderung bei trockenen und gereizten Augen”

Feucht/Trocken8%

“Halten gut feucht”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Ware wie beschrieben”

Sichtweite6%

“Besseres Sehen”

Ernährungs Gehalt6%

“Hat mir gut beim Gerstenkorn geholfen”

Nebenwirkungen3%

“Keine Nebenwirkungen danach”

What buyers complain about

Entzündung50%

“Hatte einige Wochen morgens meine Augen verklebt,und irgendwie entzündet”

Allergien25%

“Allergie”

Top return reasons

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt50%
Qualität insgesamt50%