Skip to content
40

blutgruppen schnelltest

Skip it

Brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 21Growth 10Conversion 57Competition 6Returns 99Price range 91Avg price 94Brand share 0Review moat 91Quality gap 50

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€22.69

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Great187.63

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Great€13.24–€45.63

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good4.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Bad€86K

€86K/yr · 78K searches

Growth

Bad-30.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Bad93%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 93% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

5 falling

Sellers

22

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • One Step37%
  • The Tester34%
  • Generisch24%
  • Self-Diagnostics3%
  • ratiopharm2%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€9K20%€17K30%€26K40%€34K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 8 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 49 weeks — -30.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KSpike '25Spike '26Aug '25Sep '25Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Benutzerfreundlichkeit39%

“Gut in der Anwendung”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung26%

“Überraschend einfach unter Beachtung bestimmter Regeln”

Effizienz14%

“Funktioniert super”

Genauigkeit insgesamt5%

“Das Testergebnis kann direkt abgelesen werden”

Haltbarkeit5%

“Schnelle Liferung”

Qualität insgesamt2%

“macht einen hochwertigen Eindruck”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Alles wie gewünscht”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt33%

“Müll Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis31%

“arg teuer”

Funktionalität insgesamt8%

“Die Lanzetten funktionieren überhaupt nicht”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt55%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt14%
Genauigkeit insgesamt9%
Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung9%
Touch-/Tastensteuerung9%
Alterseignung5%