Skip to content
59

ballaststoffe

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 50Growth 44Conversion 60Competition 39Returns 100Price range 71Avg price 87Brand share 67Review moat 64Quality gap 52

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€19.62

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€7.62–€33.36

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good65%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Good924.95

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Good5.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Good€277K

€277K/yr · 273K searches

Growth

Okay+15.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Okay62%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Competition

The top 5 products take 62% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 falling

Sellers

48

Top-5 brand share

65%

Open market

30%

  • natural elements24%
  • OptiFibre21%
  • EWL Naturprodukte7%
  • OMNI LOGIC7%
  • Vit4ever6%
  • WeightWorld6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€28K20%€55K30%€83K40%€111K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 20 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +15.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Super Produkt”

Reguliert die Verdauung13%

“die Verdauung funktioniert gut.”

Geschmack insgesamt9%

“Schmeckt und funktioniert”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Genau so wie bestellt”

Ernährungs Gehalt5%

“Sehr gutes Nahrungsmittel”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Super Preis”

Löslichkeit4%

“Gut löslich”

Effizienz3%

“Hilfreich”

Geschmack2%

“Es ist fast geschmacksneutral, sodass ich es auch mal in mein Porridge oder Smoothie gebe”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt2%

“Dieses PHGG ist auch um einiges feiner als mein anderes von natural factors”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt15%

“Absolut unwirksam”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis14%

“Jederzeit wieder für den Preis”

Geschmack insgesamt12%

“Ananasgeschmack doof”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Irreführend”

Reguliert die Verdauung5%

“Erzeugt Verstopfung”

Geschmack5%

“Ananasgeschmack doof”

Dosierung3%

“Mengenangaben irreführend”

Qualität insgesamt2%

“Negative Qualität keine Wirkung 1”

Geruch2%

“Der Geruch ist grauenhaft”

Süße2%

“Gute Mischung aber leider VIEL zu süss”

Top return reasons

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis50%
Gesamtgröße50%