Skip to content
54

avene

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 99% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 55Growth 49Conversion 59Competition 57Returns 99Price range 67Avg price 80Brand share 3Review moat 37Quality gap 43

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€17.17

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€6.17–€32.76

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good5.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Good51%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Good€382K

€382K/yr · 437K searches

Growth

Okay+19.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay2,817.03

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Bad99%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 51% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

6 falling

Sellers

152

Top-5 brand share

99%

Open market

0%

  • Avene82%
  • La Roche-Posay12%
  • Geek & Gorgeous2%
  • lavera2%
  • BABOR1%
  • Uriage1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€15K8%€31K12%€46K16%€61K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 36 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +19.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Eignung für Mischhaut14%

“Hält meine Rosacea super in Schach”

Qualität insgesamt12%

“Super Produkt”

Eignung für trockene Haut9%

“Für empfindliche, trockene und rissige Haut das Beste, was es auf dem Markt gibt”

Feucht/Trocken9%

“Spendet den ganzen Tag Feuchtigkeit”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Wie erhofft”

Komfort insgesamt4%

“Alles in allem sehr angenehm”

Allergien4%

“auch sehr gut, vor allem für Allergiker.”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Praktisch”

Geruch3%

“Riecht neutral”

Reinigung3%

“Das große Zuhause zum reinigen”

What buyers complain about

Allergien10%

“Natürlich muss man immer die Ursache der Haut Irritation beachten”

Farbe7%

“Blaue flüssigkeit”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“Schlechte Qualität, bestelle regelmäßig”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Sehr teuer”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit6%

“Klebt mir leider zu viel”

Textur/Konsistenz – insgesamt5%

“Creme unbrauchbar wegen wässriger Konsistenz”

Verdünnt/wässrig5%

“Creme war flüssig”

Feucht/Trocken4%

“Trocknet die Haut aus”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Beschreibung unklar”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“So unbrauchbar”

Top return reasons

Verdünnt/wässrig17%
Textur/Konsistenz – insgesamt15%
Funktionalität insgesamt10%
Defekt Material/Teile8%
Feucht/Trocken8%
Auslaufsicher7%
Wasserbeständigkeit6%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%
Farbe5%
Dicke2%