Skip to content
38

arnika

Skip it

A small market ($69K/yr) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 17Growth 18Conversion 75Competition 25Returns 100Price range 64Avg price 40Brand share 25Review moat 25Quality gap 25

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great7.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Good€2.88–€36.47

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Okay€10.77

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Okay70%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Bad90%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Bad4,005.38

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-13.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad€69K

€69K/yr · 91K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 70% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

10 flat

Sellers

53

Top-5 brand share

90%

Open market

7%

  • Kneipp61%
  • Klosterfrau15%
  • DULÀC FARMACEUTICI 19826%
  • Arnidol4%
  • WOLFGARTEN+4%
  • DHU3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 7%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€7K20%€14K30%€21K40%€28K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 16 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -13.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KSpike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Super Produkt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit10%

“Einfache Handhabung”

Linderung von Juckreiz8%

“Gut, lindert juckreiz”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Sein geld wert”

Effizienz7%

“Hilft super”

Portabilität6%

“Handlicher Roller”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Hält was es verspricht”

Einfache Anwendung4%

“Roll on super praktisch aufzutragen”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung4%

“Gut gegen Stiche”

Entzündung4%

“Das Arnika Gel hilft sehr schnell gegen Schwellungen”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt21%

“funktioniert null”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis14%

“Könnten etwas billiger sein”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt11%

“Was fehlt: Dimetindenmaleat, also ein”

Allergien11%

“geleitet als Juckreiz”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“Über die Qualität der Creme kann ich keine Aussage treffen”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“simples Marketing”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung3%

“Insekten”

Entzündung3%

“Anschwellen”

Produktzustand3%

“Stick schon genutzt”

Farbverblassen/Verfärbung3%

“Nach mehrmaligem eincremen am Abend vor dem Schlafengehen sind meine (altersbedingten) Blauen Flecken auf den Unterarmen blasser geworden.”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt27%
Auslaufsicher14%
Verbrannt/geröstet/überbacken9%
Geruch9%
Gesamtgröße9%
Wärme9%
Zufriedenheit/Vergnügen9%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit5%
Dicke3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%