Skip to content
59

aminosäuren

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 67Growth 16Conversion 73Competition 34Returns 100Price range 67Avg price 88Brand share 62Review moat 63Quality gap 65

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€20.33

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Good6.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Good€677K

€677K/yr · 489K searches

Price range

Good€3.79–€37.91

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good968.68

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good68%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay64%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Bad-18.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 64% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

18 falling

Sellers

40

Top-5 brand share

68%

Open market

26%

  • NATURTREU18%
  • ProFuel16%
  • Doppelherz13%
  • natural elements12%
  • Ennaturee9%
  • NatureWell6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€34K10%€68K15%€101K20%€135K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 19 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -18.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KPrime Day '24Spike '25Prime Day '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt18%

“Super Produkt”

Ernährungs Gehalt11%

“Bestes Protein”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Super Produkt, Preis/Leistung top”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt6%

“Solides Produkt mit guter Zusammensetzung und Wirkung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Gesehen, verglichen, Bestellt und zufrieden”

Dosierung4%

“die Dosierung um die 6000mg täglich ist für mich optimal,”

Vegan/Biologisch4%

“Solide Basis, vegan & alltagstauglich”

Vitamin4%

“Klasse Amino Supplement”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Fit”

Effizienz3%

“Wirkt”

What buyers complain about

Einfaches Kauen/Schlucken12%

“Schwer schluckbar”

Geruch8%

“stinken nach Fisch”

Dosierung7%

“niedrig dosiert”

Gesamtgröße7%

“Tabletten sind groß”

Geschmack insgesamt6%

“Schmeckt nicht”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“unmöglich einzunehmen”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Schade bei dem Preis”

Qualität insgesamt3%

“Sehr schlechte Qualität”

Ernährungs Gehalt3%

“Meine Proteinquellen waren daher immer eher begrenzt”

Allergien2%

“Vorsicht schon die dritte Tablette hat bei mir eine heftige Allergie ausgelöst”

Top return reasons

Stärke25%
Haltbarkeit25%
Geruch25%
Dosierung25%