Skip to content
57

wireless charger samsung

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($24.37 avg), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 41Growth 50Conversion 35Competition 65Returns 59Price range 84Avg price 95Brand share 62Review moat 21Quality gap 76

Avg price

Incredible€24.37

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€5.92–€73.71

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good46%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good68%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Returns

Good2.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Good+20.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Okay€210K

€210K/yr · 312K searches

Conversion

Okay2.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Bad11,010.17

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products take 46% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

18 rising

Sellers

137

Top-5 brand share

68%

Open market

27%

  • Samsung34%
  • Aimtel10%
  • AILKIN8%
  • INIU8%
  • JoyGeek8%
  • EGV5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€8K8%€17K12%€25K16%€34K101001K10K100K1.0M Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 30 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +20.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
12K8KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Aufladen41%

“Wireless Charger”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Hält, was es verspricht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Top Produkt zu einen super Preis”

Effizienz4%

“Funktioniert”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Geniales intuitives Laden”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt4%

“Ideal fürs iPhone: Mein iPhone wird sofort erkannt”

Design insgesamt3%

“modernes Design”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Perfekt auch für große Handys”

Magnetische Stärke/Adsorption2%

“der Magnet auch stark genug für größere Handys.”

What buyers complain about

Aufladen45%

“Probleme beim Aufladen von Smartphone”

Haltbarkeit10%

“Haltbarkeit 1j”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt5%

“Funktioniert nicht mit allen Ladegeräten”

Funktionalität insgesamt4%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Heizung4%

“Die Ladestation wird nicht warm”

Qualität insgesamt3%

“Nicht optimal”

Magnetische Stärke/Adsorption1%

“Kein guter Magnet”

Geräuschpegel1%

“Lautes laden durch Induktion”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker1%

“Kein USB C stecker”

Defekt Material/Teile1%

“Leider schon defekt”

Top return reasons

Aufladen49%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt16%
Funktionalität insgesamt10%
Gesamtgröße6%
Heizung3%
Defekt Material/Teile2%
Magnetische Stärke/Adsorption2%
Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker1%
Qualität insgesamt1%
Konnektivität – insgesamt1%