Skip to content
29

usb b auf usb c

Skip it

Prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($4.33–$7.15) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 17Growth 16Conversion 86Competition 8Returns 82Price range 0Avg price 17Brand share 10Review moat 27Quality gap 27

Conversion

Great9.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Great1.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay3,795.43

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad€70K

€70K/yr · 121K searches

Avg price

Bad€5.94

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Bad-17.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad96%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

Bad91%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Price range

Bad€4.33–€7.15

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products capture 91% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

6 falling

Sellers

13

Top-5 brand share

96%

Open market

0%

  • UGREEN49%
  • RAVIAD19%
  • GERETIN14%
  • Kiuet8%
  • Sailift5%
  • Thzzhnno4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%15%€10K30%€21K45%€31K60%€42K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 7 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 82 weeks — -17.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KPrime Day '25Black Friday '25JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt29%

“Super Qualität”

Gesamtgröße17%

“Passt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt12%

“Hält was es verspricht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis11%

“Preis passt”

Effizienz8%

“Funktioniert”

Konnektivität – insgesamt6%

“Gute Alternative zum Wireless”

Stärke5%

“Sehr robust macht sein Ding”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker3%

“Wertiges USB Kabel”

Flexibilität2%

“Dabei ist besonders hervorzuheben, dass dieses Kabel wesentlich flexibler ist als reine Plastikkabel”

Design insgesamt2%

“ordentlich verarbeitetes Kabel – von mir 5 Sterne.”

What buyers complain about

Konnektivität – insgesamt33%

“Wird immer schwieriger mit den Verbindungen”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt25%

“Unbrauchbar als MIDI Kabel”

Top return reasons

Kompatibilität – insgesamt27%
Gesamtgröße26%
Funktionalität insgesamt23%
Konnektivität – insgesamt15%
Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker5%
Qualität insgesamt2%
Defekt Material/Teile1%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%
Aufladen0%
Produktzustand0%