Skip to content
52

samsung galaxy s21 ladekabel

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.0%), but a small market ($33K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 8Growth 23Conversion 85Competition 71Returns 95Price range 28Avg price 35Brand share 85Review moat 24Quality gap 57

Returns

Great1.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great9.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Great50%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Good42%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Okay€10.25

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Okay€4.76–€18.97

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Bad5,395.98

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-3.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad€33K

€33K/yr · 33K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 42% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

33 flat

Sellers

45

Top-5 brand share

50%

Open market

45%

  • ipremium14%
  • Sunrson12%
  • BENSN11%
  • Powersky8%
  • LUOSIKE6%
  • JMROY5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€1K8%€3K12%€4K16%€5K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 40 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -3.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KPrime Day '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul, Aug, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Aufladen45%

“Great value fast charger with cables”

Qualität insgesamt19%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Produkt so, wie es sein soll”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Great value fast charger with cables”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Recht fit”

Stärke3%

“robust”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker2%

“Super USB-C Kabel”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Robust und zuverlässig”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt1%

“Kompatibel für mein Handy”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit1%

“Easy use”

What buyers complain about

Aufladen33%

“1/2 Ladegeräte defekt”

Haltbarkeit22%

“Futchtbar”

Qualität insgesamt10%

“Qualität ungenügend”

Heizung4%

“Stecker wird laut und sehr warm”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker3%

“jetzt Stecker defekt”

Defekt Material/Teile3%

“Defekt”

Funktionalität insgesamt3%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Konnektivität – insgesamt2%

“Steckerverbindung abgefallen”

Gesamtgröße1%

“Die 2 Meter sind mir zu lang”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%

“Reklamation”

Top return reasons

Aufladen38%
Gesamtgröße18%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt11%
Funktionalität insgesamt9%
Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker6%
Defekt Material/Teile6%
Konnektivität – insgesamt3%
Qualität insgesamt2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Heizung1%