Skip to content
22

rx 7600

Skip it

A concentrated shelf (top 5 take 100% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 50Growth 9Conversion 16Competition 0Returns 23Price range 0Avg price 42Brand share 0Review moat 79Quality gap 32

Review moat

Great428.4

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good€283K

€283K/yr · 96K searches

Avg price

Okay€229.02

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Bad6.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad1.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-32.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Bad100%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Price range

Bad€201.07–€266.73

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products capture 100% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

4 flat

Sellers

89

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • ASUS74%
  • Gigabyte13%
  • Sapphire9%
  • XFX4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%20%€57K40%€113K60%€170K80%€226K101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 5 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 85 weeks — -32.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K4KPrime Day '25Black Friday '25DecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Jan, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis33%

“Preis Leistung ok”

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Sehr gutes Produkt”

Anzeigeauflösung16%

“Perfekt fürs Full-HD gaming und gute Performance”

Haltbarkeit7%

“Nach 4 Monaten Benutzung läuft alles super”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“War alles wie besprochen topp”

Stärke4%

“Ist stabil”

Rechnenleistung4%

“Spiele laufen flüssig”

Heizung3%

“Die Temperaturen sind nach wie vor im Normalbereich”

Montage/Installation3%

“Der Einbau war unkompliziert”

Bilder pro Sekunde anzeigen1%

“Die RDNA-3-Architektur liefert flüssige Framerates”

What buyers complain about

Heizung33%

“Bei der Anzeige von 2 Stück HD Videos wird die Heat Pipe nur handwarm, es laufen keine Lüfter”

Software/Anwendung17%

“ich kann das Softwareproblem nicht beseitigen.”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis17%

“Daraufhin ist der Preis hier natürlich aufs doppelte gestiegen”

Top return reasons

Kompatibilität – insgesamt25%
Funktionalität insgesamt25%
Gesamtgröße11%
Defekt Material/Teile8%
Konnektivität – insgesamt5%
Ständiger Neustart oder Neustart4%
Produktzustand3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Anzeigeauflösung2%
Haltbarkeit2%