Skip to content
40

lan kabel 1m

Skip it

Prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($1.64–$12.51) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 28Growth 14Conversion 96Competition 36Returns 95Price range 0Avg price 18Brand share 58Review moat 23Quality gap 18

Conversion

Incredible13.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible1.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Good70%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay63%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay€118K

€118K/yr · 138K searches

Review moat

Bad7,832.12

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Bad€6.39

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Bad-22.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Bad€1.64–€12.51

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 63% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

13 rising

Sellers

40

Top-5 brand share

70%

Open market

22%

  • DDMALL27%
  • deleyCON15%
  • SNOWKIDS11%
  • Digoloan9%
  • Tesmax9%
  • BUSOHE7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€12K20%€24K30%€35K40%€47K1K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 85 weeks — -22.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KHoliday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25DecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt48%

“Super Produkt”

Konnektivität – insgesamt13%

“Solides Netzwerkkabel mit starker Leistung – ideal für Heimnetzwerke”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%

“Produkt ist so wie beschrieben”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Faire Preisgestaltung”

Stärke3%

“Solide”

Effizienz3%

“Funktioniert”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Passt”

Dicke1%

“dickes und schickes Kabel”

Form/Stil1%

“Formschön”

Kompaktheit1%

“Kompakt und gut”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit17%

“Nach zwei Monaten defekt”

Konnektivität – insgesamt15%

“Dunkle Verbindung”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis11%

“Nicht ganz günstig”

Farbe4%

“Die Farbauswahl finde ich ein wenig abenteuerlich”

Flexibilität4%

“Etwas starr”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Etwas schwer einzustecken”

Dicke4%

“Viel dünner als mein altes 8.1 Kabel”

Qualität insgesamt4%

“und somit minderwertig.”

Geruch2%

“das Material weist einen geringen Geruch auf.”

Steifheit2%

“ist es leider etwas steif”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße35%
Konnektivität – insgesamt14%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt12%
Funktionalität insgesamt11%
Länge8%
Steifheit3%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Flexibilität3%
Defekt Material/Teile3%
Dicke2%