Skip to content
51

ladestation mehrere geräte

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($29.56 avg), but soft demand (-28.5% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 30Growth 11Conversion 17Competition 70Returns 76Price range 83Avg price 95Brand share 80Review moat 49Quality gap 62

Avg price

Incredible€29.56

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€8.87–€48.87

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Great55%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Returns

Great2.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Good43%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay1,575.46

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay€135K

€135K/yr · 342K searches

Conversion

Bad1.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-28.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 43% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

28 rising

Sellers

44

Top-5 brand share

55%

Open market

41%

  • SooPii27%
  • Rocoren11%
  • HATALKIN6%
  • Alltripal6%
  • nongxiang5%
  • YSYFAD4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€5K8%€11K12%€16K16%€22K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 35 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -28.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Aufladen39%

“Wireless Charger”

Qualität insgesamt15%

“Super Qualität”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Hält, was es verspricht”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%

“Ansonsten doch sehr praktisch”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Preis-/Leistung bestens”

Design insgesamt3%

“Modernes Design”

Effizienz2%

“Funktioniert”

Stärke2%

“Genug stark für Handy, Tablet und Laptop”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt2%

“Ideal fürs iPhone: Mein iPhone wird sofort erkannt”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Passt”

What buyers complain about

Aufladen35%

“Ladefunktion nach drei Monaten defekt”

Haltbarkeit15%

“fallen immer wieder heraus.”

Qualität insgesamt6%

“Nicht optimal”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker4%

“USB Ports fallen nacheinander aus”

Heizung3%

“Hitzeprobleme”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt3%

“Nicht kompatibel”

Funktionalität insgesamt2%

“Funktioniert nicht”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Werbebetrug”

Defekt Material/Teile2%

“Artikel nach 3 Monaten defekt”

Geräuschpegel2%

“Brummton am Lautsprecher”

Top return reasons

Aufladen42%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt14%
Gesamtgröße10%
Funktionalität insgesamt8%
Defekt Material/Teile3%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker3%
Gewicht schwer2%
Heizung2%
Magnetische Stärke/Adsorption2%