Skip to content
43

hp 973x

Skip it

Brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 43Growth 8Conversion 98Competition 9Returns 71Price range 36Avg price 74Brand share 0Review moat 64Quality gap 81

Conversion

Incredible16.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Good€103.06

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Good2.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Good926.5

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay€226K

€226K/yr · 13K searches

Price range

Okay€82.13–€132.12

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Bad90%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Growth

Bad-33.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 90% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

4 falling

Sellers

78

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • HP79%
  • Smart Ink9%
  • GREENSKY8%
  • Jettruemedia3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%15%€34K30%€68K45%€102K60%€136K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 8 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 85 weeks — -33.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
450350Holiday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25Holiday '25Spike '26DecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Druckqualität50%

“Drucker funktioniert super”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt17%

“tut was es soll”

Gesamtgröße17%

“Passen perfekt”

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Super Produkt”

What buyers complain about

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis33%

“Leider Geldverschwendung”

Haltbarkeit33%

“Läuft aus”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt33%

“Meine hier gekaufte Originalpatrone wird vom HP Pagewide 477 nicht erkannt / akzeptiert”

Top return reasons

Kompatibilität – insgesamt31%
Funktionalität insgesamt24%
Gesamtgröße15%
Defekt Material/Teile9%
Tintennachfüllung4%
Produktzustand4%
Farbe2%
Qualität insgesamt2%
Druckqualität2%
Messung / Ablesegenauigkeit2%