Skip to content
53

hp 302 xl

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (15.0% search→purchase), but soft demand (-23.5% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 19Growth 13Conversion 97Competition 50Returns 97Price range 95Avg price 95Brand share 52Review moat 21Quality gap 53

Conversion

Incredible15.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible0.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€31.84

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Incredible€16.20–€100.41

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Good74%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay55%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Bad10,493.58

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad€77K

€77K/yr · 16K searches

Growth

Bad-23.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 55% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

18 flat

Sellers

139

Top-5 brand share

74%

Open market

22%

  • HP28%
  • VVQV17%
  • INFITONER16%
  • Neiber7%
  • ANKINK6%
  • COLORETTO4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€4K10%€8K15%€12K20%€15K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 24 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 85 weeks — -23.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KSpike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25DecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Jan, Aug, Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt25%

“Incredible quality”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis21%

“Bestes Preis-Leistungsverhältnis”

Gesamtgröße12%

“Passt”

Druckqualität7%

“Super Druckerpatronen”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“so wie bestellt”

Farbe5%

“Super Farbergebnis”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt5%

“HP geeignet”

Patrone/Tinte Qualität4%

“the quality of the printer cartridges is incredible”

Haltbarkeit2%

“schnelle liferung”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Super easy auszutauschen”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt19%

“Keine der üblichen Lösungen half”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt15%

“Inkompatibel”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis12%

“Verschwendetes Geld”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Müll”

Patronekapazität5%

“Drucker zeigt Patronen als leer an”

Druckqualität5%

“Schlechtes Druckbild”

Farbe5%

“verblasst die Farbe.”

Haltbarkeit4%

“Nach paar Tage defekt”

Anzeigefarben2%

“Bildern sind die Farben gefühlt weniger intensiv.”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“er druckt nicht.”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt31%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt24%
Gesamtgröße18%
Druckqualität4%
Defekt Material/Teile3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Patrone/Tinte Qualität3%
Farbe3%
Tintennachfüllung2%
Patronekapazität2%