Skip to content
53

apple ladekabel

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.9%), but soft demand (-6.6% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 65Growth 22Conversion 79Competition 60Returns 95Price range 36Avg price 43Brand share 35Review moat 23Quality gap 52

Returns

Incredible0.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great7.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Good€609K

€609K/yr · 687K searches

Competition

Good49%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Okay€11.21

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Okay€5.25–€20.42

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay84%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Bad6,969.69

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-6.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 49% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 flat

Sellers

31

Top-5 brand share

84%

Open market

14%

  • Apple52%
  • Sunrson14%
  • BSTOEM11%
  • FEEL2NICE5%
  • INSYSTEM3%
  • Kitminun2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (10 brands, 14%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€24K8%€49K12%€73K16%€97K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 29 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 85 weeks — -6.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
30K20KHoliday '24Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26DecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Jul, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Aufladen36%

“Fast charging”

Qualität insgesamt21%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt10%

“Erfüllt ihren Zweck”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“Super Preis-Leistung”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Passt”

Stärke3%

“Solide”

Effizienz2%

“Funktioniert super”

Flexibilität1%

“Flexibel”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker1%

“Auch der USB-C-Anschluss ist fest und zuverlässig”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit1%

“Super zu handhaben”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit28%

“Stops working after a couple of days”

Aufladen25%

“Ladekabel hält nicht in IPhone”

Qualität insgesamt15%

“Qualität ungenügend”

Funktionalität insgesamt6%

“Stops working after a couple of days”

Defekt Material/Teile3%

“Defekt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Absolut sein Geld nicht wert”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker2%

“Netzstecker Müll”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Adapter viel grösser als erwartet”

Konnektivität – insgesamt2%

“Der Anschluss zum Handy ist bei beiden Kabeln im Handy gebrochen”

Flexibilität1%

“Kabel könnte flexibler sein”

Top return reasons

Aufladen33%
Gesamtgröße17%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt14%
Funktionalität insgesamt11%
Defekt Material/Teile6%
Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker5%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Konnektivität – insgesamt2%
Länge2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%