Skip to content
36

viehmarker

Skip it

Soft demand (-90.9% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 2Growth 0Conversion 55Competition 13Returns 98Price range 34Avg price 26Brand share 24Review moat 96Quality gap 78

Returns

Incredible0.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Incredible78

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Good4.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Okay€3.95–€20.75

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Okay€9.08

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Bad90%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

Bad84%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Market size

Bad€9K

€9K/yr · 22K searches

Growth

Bad-90.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products capture 84% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

7 rising

Sellers

27

Top-5 brand share

90%

Open market

3%

  • Landkaufhaus Mayer36%
  • Kerbl21%
  • PFIFF19%
  • QUEBAg7%
  • Raidl7%
  • Agritura6%
  • Open — no brand owns it (1 brand, 3%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€93820%€2K30%€3K40%€4K1101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 10 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 20 weeks — -90.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
900700Spike '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt28%

“Super Qualität”

Haltbarkeit22%

“Sieht ergiebig aus und sollte eine Weile halten”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%

“Erfüllt den Zweck”

Geruch11%

“Duft angenehm dezent”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis11%

“Preis/Leistung gut”

Farbe6%

“Dafür eignet sich die Farbe wirklich gut”

Einfache Reinigung6%

“Lassen sich aber gut abwaschen”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%

“Die Anwendung ist einfach”

What buyers complain about

Haftung/Klebrigkeit50%

“Haftet kaum”

Haltbarkeit50%

“2 sind nach ein paar benutzungen auseinander gefallen”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt23%
Qualität insgesamt15%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt15%
Sprühen/Durchfluss15%
Defekt Material/Teile8%
Gesamtgröße8%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%
Atmungsaktivität4%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%