Skip to content
58

spitztüten papier

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.8%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 14Growth 63Conversion 56Competition 76Returns 96Price range 81Avg price 35Brand share 57Review moat 91Quality gap 40

Returns

Incredible0.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Great175.71

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Great€3.42–€70.66

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Great39%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Growth

Good+41.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Good71%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Good4.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Okay€10.22

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Bad€56K

€56K/yr · 117K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (39% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

24 falling

Sellers

37

Top-5 brand share

71%

Open market

23%

  • PGV24%
  • Ameisenkeks21%
  • what the shop10%
  • Yoosso9%
  • XMBYGEY8%
  • VEPATIM6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€2K6%€3K9%€5K12%€7K1101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 42 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +41.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
8K6KHoliday '24Spike '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt28%

“top Produkt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit15%

“Super Artikel leicht zu bedienen”

Geschenk Zweck12%

“Super zum verschenken”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis11%

“Top für den Preis”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%

“Alles wie beschrieben top Verkäufer”

Stärke6%

“Insgesamt solide,”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Passt”

Füllt insgesamt nach4%

“Sie ließen sich gut befüllen und verschließen”

Geruch4%

“Keine unangenehmen Gerüche”

Design insgesamt1%

“süß gestaltet”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße67%

“zu klein”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“teuer”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Falsche Angaben”

Qualität insgesamt6%

“Wer jedoch eine besonders stabile oder hochwertigere Variante sucht, sollte eventuell eine andere Option in Betracht ziehen”

Dicke4%

“Allerdings ist das Material recht dünn, wodurch die Tüten etwas empfindlich wirken”

Stärke2%

“etwas dünn”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße84%
Qualität insgesamt6%
Dünn5%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%
Haltbarkeit1%
Papierqualität1%
Funktionalität insgesamt1%