[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"blog-en-which-pricing-suits-a-new-amazon-brand":3,"blog-translations-which-pricing-suits-a-new-amazon-brand":53,"blog-related-category-en-which-pricing-suits-a-new-amazon-brand":54,"blog-related-latest-en-which-pricing-suits-a-new-amazon-brand":67},{"id":4,"type":5,"locale":6,"slug":7,"title":8,"description":9,"body":10,"status":11,"section":12,"tags":13,"author":17,"cover_url":18,"published_at":19,"metadata":20,"template":5,"sort_order":48,"source_id":49,"search_vector":50,"created_at":51,"updated_at":52},"fafdd9e3-a2c1-4ecc-b78a-cb99346377dd","blog","en","which-pricing-suits-a-new-amazon-brand","Which pricing suits a new Amazon brand","A new brand should pay a flat fee, since no baseline exists to price performance. Budget $800 to $2,400 a month plus $8,000 to $15,000 in launch capital.","A new brand should pay a flat fee. At launch there is no revenue to share and no ad history to bonus against, so any performance model is priced on guesswork. Budget $800 to $2,400 a month by product count, plus $8,000 to $15,000 of launch capital for a single product.\n\n## The short version\n\n- **Performance pricing needs a baseline.** A brand with no sales history has none, so the percentage is invented.\n- **Flat fees are predictable while everything else is not.** During a launch, predictability is worth paying for.\n- **The fee is the small number.** Inventory, freight and ad spend dwarf it in year one.\n- **Plan for about seven months** to take a full brand from decision to launched.\n- **First invoice covers first and last month upfront**, so include that in the opening cash plan.\n\n## What I learned buying these services, not selling them\n\nBefore Flapen I ran data and technology at BRANDED and at Moonshot Brands, two large Amazon aggregators, which meant I sat on the buying side of agency contracts rather than the selling side. The pattern was consistent. Performance deals looked attractive on the newest brands and settled worst there, because nobody could agree what the baseline had been. On acquired brands with two years of clean history, a percentage was arguable. On something launched last quarter, the negotiation turned into an argument about a counterfactual that no data existed to settle.\n\nThat experience is why I will talk a new brand out of performance pricing even when it would earn us more. There is nothing to measure against yet.\n\n## The arithmetic of a first year\n\nHere is the shape of the spend, so the management fee sits in proportion.\n\n| Line | Single product | Five product brand |\n|---|---|---|\n| Launch capital, all in | $8,000 to $15,000 | $25,000 to $50,000 |\n| Management fee, monthly | $800 | $2,400 |\n| Recommended ad spend, monthly | From $1,000 | Scaled by catalog |\n| Validation phase | 200 units, $5,000 to $10,000 | Up to four products tested at once |\n| Time to launched brand | Gated by validation, not by the fee | About seven months for a full brand |\n\nLaunch capital covers inventory, freight, photography, trademark filing and the opening ad budget. It is not the agency fee, and any proposal that blends the two is hiding something. Ask for a version that separates them before you compare two offers.\n\nTwo numbers to hold onto. There is no hard minimum ad spend, but below about $1,000 a month there is not enough data for optimization to mean anything, so the fee buys less than it should. And the first invoice covering first and last month upfront is a real cash line in month one, not a footnote.\n\n## Why the flat fee is cheaper than it looks\n\nRun the comparison at the level of what each dollar buys rather than what it costs. A single product at $800 a month carries the same service set as the top tier: research, listing build, creative, advertising, reporting and the operator who owns it. There is no commission on top, no revenue share and no onboarding fee, so the annual number is knowable on the day you sign.\n\nCompare that to a percentage arrangement on a brand that succeeds. If the brand works, the percentage compounds, and the invoice at month eighteen bears no relationship to the workload. If the brand does not work, you are paying almost nothing to an agency that has lost interest. Neither outcome is what a founder wants from a launch partner.\n\n## Where new brands actually overspend\n\nNot on management. On inventory ordered before validation, on photography reshot three times because the brief was wrong, and on advertising poured into a listing that was never going to convert. Fix the order of operations and the fee stops being the thing you worry about.\n\n## What a launch quote will not tell you\n\nAlmost nobody separates the cost of being wrong from the cost of the service. A first product has a real chance of failing, and the sensible plan spends a small, bounded amount finding out. That is why our validation phase is 200 units and $5,000 to $10,000 rather than a full container. A quote that assumes success and prices twelve months of management against it is selling you confidence you have not earned yet.\n\nThe second thing: ask what the fee does if you decide to stop. Ours is month to month with 30 days' notice, no long term contract and no lock in, and on exit you keep the Seller Central account, the campaigns, the creative and a written handover. A new brand should treat that clause as more important than the price, because the price is knowable and the future is not.\n\n## Related answers\n\n- [Alternatives to percentage of sales pricing on Amazon](\u002Fblog\u002Falternatives-to-percentage-of-sales-pricing-on-amazon)\n- [How to launch your first product on Amazon](\u002Fblog\u002Fhow-to-launch-first-product-on-amazon)\n- [Amazon brand management pricing breakdown](\u002Fblog\u002Famazon-brand-management-pricing-breakdown)\n- [Commission only Amazon agency pros and cons](\u002Fblog\u002Fcommission-only-amazon-agency-pros-and-cons)\n- [Hiring an Amazon agency: the complete guide](\u002Fblog\u002Fhiring-an-agency)\n\nBring your category and your budget, and we will size both in writing at [Flapen](\u002Famazon-consulting).\n\n## Keep learning\n\n- [Compare Amazon business models](\u002Fguides\u002Fbusiness-models)\n- [Value your Amazon business](\u002Ftools\u002Fbusiness-value-calculator)\n","published","working-with-agencies",[14,15,16],"fees","private-label","amazon-fba","joel-turcotte-gaucher","\u002Fimages\u002Fblog\u002Fclusters\u002Fhiring-an-agency-07.jpg","2026-09-04T02:42:51.798+00:00",{"faq":21,"seo":42,"batch":43,"cluster":44,"cover_alt":45,"answers_prompt":46,"primary_benchmark":47},[22,26,30,34,38],{"id":23,"answer":24,"question":25},"which-pricing-suits-a-new-amazon-brand-faq-1","No. There is no baseline, so the percentage is guesswork and the disputes start in month three. Pay a flat fee until you have enough history that a performance number can be argued from data.","Should a brand new seller pay a percentage of sales?",{"id":27,"answer":28,"question":29},"which-pricing-suits-a-new-amazon-brand-faq-2","Ignore that ratio in year one. Revenue starts near zero and the ratio will look terrible no matter who you hire. Judge the fee against the work scope and the operator's brand load instead.","How much should the fee be relative to revenue?",{"id":31,"answer":32,"question":33},"which-pricing-suits-a-new-amazon-brand-faq-3","Between $8,000 and $15,000 including inventory, freight, creative and opening ad budget. A five product brand runs $25,000 to $50,000, and takes around seven months end to end.","What is the total cash needed to launch one product?",{"id":35,"answer":36,"question":37},"which-pricing-suits-a-new-amazon-brand-faq-4","Around four to six hours a week during a launch, dropping to about two hours a month once the brand is running. If a provider says zero, they are not planning to ask you anything.","How much of my own time will this take?",{"id":39,"answer":40,"question":41},"which-pricing-suits-a-new-amazon-brand-faq-5","Yes, and it is usually the right sequence. Pricing tiers by product count, so the fee steps up only when the catalog does.","Can I start with one product and add more later?",{},"B03","C01","Flapen cover for Which pricing suits a new Amazon brand: a Flapen operator and a client walking an aisle of cartons with a tablet","which pricing suits a new amazon brand","B10",0,null,"'\u002Famazon-consulting':892C '\u002Fblog\u002Falternatives-to-percentage-of-sales-pricing-on-amazon':845C '\u002Fblog\u002Famazon-brand-management-pricing-breakdown':860C '\u002Fblog\u002Fcommission-only-amazon-agency-pros-and-cons':868C '\u002Fblog\u002Fhiring-an-agency':876C '\u002Fblog\u002Fhow-to-launch-first-product-on-amazon':854C '\u002Fguides\u002Fbusiness-models':899C '\u002Ftools\u002Fbusiness-value-calculator':904C '000':32B,35B,82C,85C,336C,339C,341C,344C,357C,366C,369C,452C,734C,737C '1':356C,451C '10':368C,736C '15':34B,84C,338C '2':26B,73C,349C '200':363C,730C '25':340C '30':784C '400':27B,74C,350C '5':365C,733C '50':343C '8':31B,81C,335C '800':24B,71C,348C,523C 'a':4A,8B,13B,28B,39C,44C,75C,90C,99C,101C,124C,154C,253C,269C,284C,308C,392C,426C,453C,484C,492C,519C,524C,574C,578C,623C,627C,658C,682C,703C,707C,717C,740C,743C,809C,812C 'about':149C,268C,388C,450C,680C 'account':803C 'acquired':245C 'actually':633C 'ad':57C,140C,352C,406C,446C 'advertising':539C,655C 'against':61C,303C,754C 'agency':212C,412C,614C,864C,872C 'aggregators':202C 'agree':238C 'all':333C 'almost':610C,689C 'alternatives':837C 'amazon':6A,201C,844C,853C,855C,863C,871C,896C,902C,910 'amazon-fba':909 'amount':720C 'an':266C,613C,870C 'and':55C,139C,165C,191C,195C,231C,403C,414C,473C,479C,541C,556C,589C,653C,671C,712C,732C,748C,791C,795C,808C,830C,866C,880C,883C 'annual':562C 'answers':836C 'any':63C,415C 'anything':464C 'are':116C,608C 'arguable':256C 'argument':267C 'arithmetic':306C 'arrangement':576C 'as':531C,819C 'ask':424C,768C 'assumes':746C 'at':47C,193C,196C,375C,506C,522C,592C,890C 'attractive':226C 'baseline':18B,100C,241C 'bears':595C 'because':235C,648C,825C 'been':243C 'before':186C,431C,641C 'being':675C,695C 'below':449C 'blends':418C 'bonus':60C 'both':887C 'bounded':719C 'brand':7A,10B,41C,102C,156C,286C,330C,380C,394C,579C,584C,603C,814C,856C 'branded':194C 'brands':198C,230C,246C,632C 'breakdown':859C 'brief':650C 'bring':877C 'budget':23B,70C,407C,882C 'build':537C 'business':897C,903C 'but':448C 'buying':180C,209C 'buys':468C,513C 'by':77C,359C,382C,385C 'campaigns':805C 'capital':38B,88C,332C,396C 'carries':526C 'cash':175C,486C 'catalog':360C 'category':879C 'central':802C 'chance':709C 'cheaper':499C 'clause':818C 'clean':251C 'commission':550C,861C 'compare':433C,571C,895C 'comparison':505C 'complete':874C 'compounds':588C 'confidence':759C 'cons':867C 'consistent':222C 'container':742C 'contract':790C 'contracts':213C 'convert':665C 'cost':693C,699C 'costs':518C 'could':237C 'count':79C 'counterfactual':270C 'covering':477C 'covers':163C,397C 'creative':538C,807C 'data':190C,273C,459C 'day':568C 'days':785C 'deals':224C 'decide':775C 'decision':158C 'does':604C,772C 'dollar':512C 'during':123C 'dwarf':142C 'each':511C 'earn':295C 'earned':763C 'eighteen':594C 'else':120C 'enough':458C 'even':291C 'everything':119C 'existed':274C 'exists':19B 'exit':797C 'experience':278C 'failing':711C 'fba':911 'fee':15B,46C,132C,321C,346C,387C,413C,467C,497C,559C,673C,771C 'fees':115C,905 'filing':402C 'finding':721C 'first':161C,164C,309C,475C,478C,704C,850C 'five':328C 'fix':666C 'flapen':187C,891C 'flat':14B,45C,114C,496C 'footnote':493C 'for':89C,130C,148C,391C,425C,460C 'founder':624C 'four':372C 'freight':138C,399C 'from':157C,355C,626C,697C 'full':155C,393C,741C 'future':832C 'gated':381C 'going':663C 'guesswork':69C 'guide':875C 'had':242C 'handover':811C 'hard':444C 'has':107C,616C,706C 'have':761C 'here':311C 'hiding':422C 'hiring':869C 'history':58C,106C,252C 'hold':439C 'how':846C 'i':178C,188C,205C,281C 'if':582C,601C,773C 'important':821C 'in':36B,144C,172C,323C,334C,488C,794C,888C 'include':170C 'interest':618C 'into':265C,657C 'invented':113C 'inventory':137C,398C,639C 'invoice':162C,476C,591C 'is':50C,66C,112C,121C,127C,133C,279C,299C,312C,409C,421C,442C,456C,483C,498C,548C,564C,621C,724C,729C,756C,779C,828C,833C 'it':143C,293C,408C,471C,501C,517C,546C,755C 'keep':799C,893C 'knowable':565C,829C 'label':908 'large':200C 'last':166C,260C,480C 'launch':37B,48C,87C,125C,331C,395C,628C,683C,848C 'launched':160C,259C,379C 'learned':179C 'learning':894C 'less':469C 'level':508C 'line':325C,487C 'listing':536C,659C 'lock':793C 'long':788C 'looked':225C 'looks':502C 'lost':617C 'management':320C,345C,637C,753C,857C 'mean':463C 'meant':204C 'measure':302C 'minimum':445C 'model':65C 'models':898C 'month':29B,76C,167C,454C,481C,489C,525C,593C,780C,782C 'monthly':347C,354C 'months':151C,390C,751C 'moonshot':197C 'more':297C,820C 'needs':98C 'negotiation':263C 'neither':619C 'never':662C 'new':5A,9B,40C,285C,631C,813C 'newest':229C 'no':17B,51C,56C,104C,272C,443C,549C,553C,557C,596C,787C,792C 'nobody':236C,690C 'none':108C 'not':122C,183C,384C,410C,457C,491C,605C,635C,686C,762C,834C 'nothing':300C,611C 'notice':786C 'number':136C,563C 'numbers':437C 'of':86C,211C,250C,288C,307C,315C,509C,669C,694C,700C,710C,752C,840C 'offers':435C 'on':68C,207C,227C,244C,257C,551C,566C,577C,636C,638C,643C,654C,796C,843C,852C 'onboarding':558C 'once':376C 'one':146C,490C 'only':862C 'onto':440C 'opening':174C,405C 'operations':670C 'operator':543C 'optimization':461C 'order':668C 'ordered':640C 'our':726C 'ours':778C 'out':287C,722C 'outcome':620C 'overspend':634C 'owns':545C 'partner':629C 'pattern':220C 'pay':12B,43C 'paying':129C,609C 'percentage':111C,254C,575C,587C,839C 'performance':22B,64C,96C,223C,289C 'phase':362C,728C 'photography':400C,644C 'plan':147C,176C,715C 'plus':30B,80C 'poured':656C 'predictability':126C 'predictable':117C 'price':21B,824C,827C 'priced':67C 'prices':749C 'pricing':2A,97C,290C,842C,858C 'private':907 'private-label':906 'product':78C,92C,327C,329C,521C,705C,851C 'products':373C 'proportion':324C 'proposal':416C 'pros':865C 'quarter':261C 'quote':684C,744C 'ran':189C 'rather':214C,514C,738C 'real':485C,708C 'recommended':351C 'related':835C 'relationship':597C 'reporting':540C 'research':535C 'reshot':645C 'revenue':52C,554C 'run':503C 'sales':105C,841C 'same':528C 'sat':206C 'scaled':358C 'second':766C 'seller':801C 'selling':184C,217C,757C 'sensible':714C 'separates':429C,691C 'service':529C,702C 'services':182C 'set':530C 'settle':276C 'settled':232C 'seven':150C,389C 'shape':314C 'share':54C,555C 'short':94C 'should':11B,42C,472C,815C 'side':210C,218C 'sign':570C 'since':16B 'single':91C,326C,520C 'sits':322C 'size':886C 'small':135C,718C 'so':62C,109C,169C,318C,465C,560C 'something':258C,423C 'spend':141C,317C,353C,447C 'spends':716C 'stop':777C 'stops':674C 'succeeds':581C 'success':747C 'suits':3A 'take':153C 'talk':283C 'technology':192C 'tell':687C 'term':789C 'tested':374C 'than':215C,470C,500C,515C,739C,822C 'that':171C,271C,277C,417C,428C,572C,580C,615C,660C,723C,745C,817C 'the':93C,110C,131C,134C,173C,208C,216C,219C,228C,240C,262C,305C,313C,316C,319C,386C,404C,411C,419C,466C,474C,495C,504C,507C,527C,532C,542C,561C,567C,583C,586C,590C,599C,602C,649C,667C,672C,676C,692C,698C,701C,713C,765C,770C,800C,804C,806C,823C,826C,831C,873C 'them':185C,430C 'there':49C,234C,298C,441C,455C,547C 'these':181C 'thing':677C,767C 'three':646C 'tier':534C 'time':377C 'times':647C 'to':20B,25B,33B,53C,59C,72C,83C,152C,159C,275C,301C,337C,342C,367C,371C,378C,438C,462C,573C,598C,612C,664C,735C,776C,781C,838C,847C 'top':533C,552C 'trademark':401C 'treat':816C 'turned':264C 'twelve':750C 'two':199C,248C,420C,434C,436C 'units':364C,731C 'up':370C 'upfront':168C,482C 'us':296C 'validation':361C,383C,642C,727C 'value':900C 'version':95C,427C 'wants':625C 'was':221C,255C,651C,661C 'we':884C 'what':177C,239C,510C,516C,622C,681C,769C 'when':292C 'where':630C 'which':1A,203C 'while':118C 'who':544C 'why':280C,494C,725C 'will':282C,685C,885C 'with':103C,247C,783C 'work':606C 'workload':600C 'works':585C 'worry':679C 'worst':233C 'worth':128C 'would':294C 'writing':889C 'written':810C 'wrong':652C,696C 'year':145C,310C 'years':249C 'yet':304C,764C 'you':432C,569C,607C,678C,688C,758C,760C,774C,798C 'your':849C,878C,881C,901C","2026-09-04T16:27:29.004966+00:00","2026-09-04T16:34:40.014303+00:00",[],[55,59,63],{"slug":56,"title":57,"published_at":58},"brand-tiers","Amazon brand management tiers: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:33:51.798+00:00",{"slug":60,"title":61,"published_at":62},"done-for-you-management","Done-for-you Amazon management: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:26:51.798+00:00",{"slug":64,"title":65,"published_at":66},"build-vs-buy","Build vs buy for your Amazon channel: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:25:51.798+00:00",[68,69,73],{"slug":56,"title":57,"published_at":58},{"slug":70,"title":71,"published_at":72},"geography-and-marketplaces","Amazon marketplaces by geography: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:32:51.798+00:00",{"slug":74,"title":75,"published_at":76},"measurement-and-audit","Amazon account measurement and audits: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:31:51.798+00:00"]