[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"blog-en-what-to-use-for-keyword-gap-analysis-on-amazon":3,"blog-translations-what-to-use-for-keyword-gap-analysis-on-amazon":54,"blog-related-latest-en-what-to-use-for-keyword-gap-analysis-on-amazon":55,"blog-related-category-en-what-to-use-for-keyword-gap-analysis-on-amazon":68},{"id":4,"type":5,"locale":6,"slug":7,"title":8,"description":9,"body":10,"status":11,"section":12,"tags":13,"author":18,"cover_url":19,"published_at":20,"metadata":21,"template":5,"sort_order":49,"source_id":50,"search_vector":51,"created_at":52,"updated_at":53},"83e1b1f9-efdb-4491-8611-a0656d74948e","blog","en","what-to-use-for-keyword-gap-analysis-on-amazon","What to use for keyword gap analysis on Amazon","Combine Brand Analytics, Search Query Performance, reverse-ASIN lookups on top competitors, and manual searches. The gap is where they rank and you do not.","Use three sources together for Amazon keyword gap analysis: Brand Analytics and Search Query Performance for your own coverage, a reverse-ASIN lookup on the top three competitors for theirs, and manual search checks to confirm intent. The gap list is every term where a competitor ranks top ten and you do not index.\n\n## The short version\n\n- **A gap has a precise definition:** a term where a competitor ranks top ten and you do not index at all.\n- **Amazon's own data comes first.** Search Query Performance shows where you already win and lose real queries.\n- **Reverse-ASIN tools map the competitor side.** Three competitors is enough. Thirty is noise.\n- **Manual searches confirm intent.** A term is only a gap if its results page shows your kind of product.\n- **Route every gap to one of two homes:** listing content or a PPC campaign. A gap with no home is trivia.\n\n## How gap analysis actually works\n\nThe mechanism is simple: shoppers reach your category through a finite set of search terms, you capture some of them, competitors capture others, and the overlap is visible in data. Gap analysis is the act of listing the terms your competitors monetize that you do not touch, then deciding which ones you have a right to win.\n\nThe output is only useful when it feeds a decision. That is why the definition matters. \"They rank higher than us\" is not a gap, it is a fight. \"They rank top ten and we do not index\" is a gap, because indexing is fixable this week by putting the term into your listing.\n\n## Scoring your options\n\nNot every data source deserves a place in the workflow. Here is the scorecard I use when deciding what to rely on, with weights reflecting what actually changes decisions.\n\n| Criterion | Weight | What good looks like |\n|---|---|---|\n| Query truth | 30% | Real Amazon search terms, not scraped web volume |\n| Competitor coverage | 25% | Reverse-ASIN depth on the exact rivals you name |\n| Intent visibility | 20% | You can see what the results page actually sells |\n| Actionability | 15% | Exports cleanly into listing edits and campaigns |\n| Cost and effort | 10% | Sustainable to rerun quarterly |\n\nScore each candidate source 1 to 5 per row and weight it. Amazon's Brand Analytics and Search Query Performance dominate on query truth and cost, which is why they anchor the workflow for any brand-registered seller. Third-party reverse-ASIN tools earn their fee on competitor coverage, the one thing Amazon will not show you. Manual searching scores highest on intent visibility and costs only time.\n\n## The workflow, start to finish\n\n1. Pull your own query data from Search Query Performance and list every term already generating impressions and clicks.\n2. Run reverse-ASIN lookups on your top three competitors and keep terms where any of them ranks in the top ten.\n3. Subtract your indexed terms from their ranked terms. What remains is the raw gap list.\n4. Manually search each surviving term and cut any where the results page sells a different product type. Rank position without purchase intent is worthless.\n5. Route each confirmed gap: high-relevance terms go into title, bullets, and backend keywords as part of [listing optimization](\u002Famazon-listing-optimization), commercial terms with proven volume get a PPC test with its own budget.\n6. Rerun the whole exercise quarterly. Competitor coverage moves, and a gap list decays like inventory.\n\nA warning on scope: keyword gaps are one lens on a market, and a narrow one. When we research a category we pull 90 or more data points on it, market size, growth trajectory, return rates, segment dynamics, rating gaps, before keywords enter the conversation. Ask anyone offering you gap analysis what they look at besides search volume and review counts. The answer tells you whether you are buying research or a tool export.\n\n## What keyword tools will not tell you\n\nEvery third-party volume figure is an estimate, and estimates disagree with each other by wide margins on the same term. Treat volumes as ordering information, this term is bigger than that one, never as forecasts. The second silence is profitability. A tool can show a competitor ranking on a term, but not whether those clicks make them any money. Chasing a rival into a high-cost term they overpay for is a gap analysis failure that looks like a success for two quarters.\n\nIndexing is the third. Adding a term to your listing makes you eligible to rank, nothing more. Rank follows conversion on that query, which is decided by your image, price, and rating against that results page. The gap list opens the door. The listing walks through it.\n\n## Related answers\n\n- [Competitor analysis methods in an Amazon growth audit](\u002Fblog\u002Fcompetitor-analysis-methods-in-an-amazon-growth-audit)\n- [Amazon SEO audit services for new product launches](\u002Fblog\u002Famazon-seo-audit-services-for-new-product-launches)\n- [Amazon listing audit checklist for conversion boosts](\u002Fblog\u002Famazon-listing-audit-checklist-for-conversion-boosts)\n- [Best audit for Amazon PPC structure and neg match](\u002Fblog\u002Fbest-audit-for-amazon-ppc-structure-and-neg-match)\n- [Amazon creative services: the complete guide](\u002Fblog\u002Fcreative-services)\n\nTo have this workflow run on your catalog with the gaps already routed to fixes, start with [Flapen](\u002Famazon-consulting).\n\n## Keep learning\n\n- [Optimize the listing](\u002Fguides\u002Flisting-optimization)\n- [Run the review math](\u002Ftools\u002Freview-calculator)\n","published","listing-optimization",[14,15,16,17],"keyword-strategy","competitor-analysis","organic-ranking","ppc","joel-turcotte-gaucher","\u002Fimages\u002Fblog\u002Fclusters\u002Fcreative-services-03.jpg","2026-09-04T12:37:51.798+00:00",{"faq":22,"seo":43,"batch":44,"cluster":45,"cover_alt":46,"answers_prompt":47,"primary_benchmark":48},[23,27,31,35,39],{"id":24,"answer":25,"question":26},"what-to-use-for-keyword-gap-analysis-on-amazon-faq-1","Three, chosen because they win the searches you want. Past three, the term lists converge and each additional competitor adds noise faster than signal. Refresh the trio quarterly.","How many competitors should a gap analysis include?",{"id":28,"answer":29,"question":30},"what-to-use-for-keyword-gap-analysis-on-amazon-faq-2","Mostly, if you are brand registered. Search Query Performance covers your side and manual searching covers intent. What you lose without a reverse-ASIN tool is the systematic competitor side, which you can partially rebuild by hand for a small catalog.","Can I do gap analysis without paid tools?",{"id":32,"answer":33,"question":34},"what-to-use-for-keyword-gap-analysis-on-amazon-faq-3","Quarterly, and after any major competitor enters or exits. Gap lists decay because rankings move. A one-time gap analysis is a snapshot someone will mistake for a map a year later.","How often should the analysis be rerun?",{"id":36,"answer":37,"question":38},"what-to-use-for-keyword-gap-analysis-on-amazon-faq-4","Not indexing means Amazon does not associate your listing with the term at all, which is fixed by putting the term in your content. Not ranking means you index but sit deep in results, which is fixed by conversion and traffic, a much longer campaign.","What is the difference between not ranking and not indexing?",{"id":40,"answer":41,"question":42},"what-to-use-for-keyword-gap-analysis-on-amazon-faq-5","Listing first, always. Indexing is free and permanent. Then test the commercially promising terms with PPC, where the click data tells you which gaps deserve a real push.","Should gap terms go into ads or the listing first?",{},"B15","C08","Flapen cover for What to use for keyword gap analysis on Amazon: a Flapen operator reviewing a grid of listing image frames on a monitor","what to use for keyword gap analysis on amazon","B6",0,null,"'\u002Famazon-consulting':882C '\u002Famazon-listing-optimization':575C '\u002Fblog\u002Famazon-listing-audit-checklist-for-conversion-boosts':846C '\u002Fblog\u002Famazon-seo-audit-services-for-new-product-launches':838C '\u002Fblog\u002Fbest-audit-for-amazon-ppc-structure-and-neg-match':856C '\u002Fblog\u002Fcompetitor-analysis-methods-in-an-amazon-growth-audit':829C '\u002Fblog\u002Fcreative-services':863C '\u002Fguides\u002Flisting-optimization':888C '\u002Ftools\u002Freview-calculator':893C '1':399C,471C '10':390C '15':379C '2':490C '20':368C '25':355C '3':513C '30':344C '4':529C '5':401C,554C '6':589C '90':628C 'a':55C,81C,94C,97C,100C,103C,152C,156C,178C,181C,202C,246C,258C,273C,277C,289C,312C,543C,582C,599C,605C,615C,618C,624C,676C,728C,732C,736C,748C,751C,760C,767C,777C 'act':227C 'actionability':378C 'actually':191C,333C,376C 'adding':776C 'against':804C 'all':114C 'already':127C,485C,875C 'amazon':9A,41C,115C,346C,407C,450C,826C,830C,839C,850C,857C 'an':693C,825C 'analysis':7A,44C,190C,224C,655C,762C,822C,899 'analytics':12B,46C,410C 'anchor':425C 'and':23B,32B,47C,67C,86C,108C,129C,216C,283C,385C,388C,404C,411C,419C,462C,481C,488C,501C,535C,567C,598C,617C,663C,695C,802C,853C 'answer':667C 'answers':820C 'any':429C,505C,537C,745C 'anyone':651C 'are':611C,672C 'as':570C,710C,721C 'asin':18B,58C,135C,358C,439C,494C 'ask':650C 'at':113C,659C 'audit':828C,832C,841C,848C 'backend':568C 'because':291C 'before':645C 'besides':660C 'best':847C 'bigger':716C 'boosts':845C 'brand':11B,45C,409C,431C 'brand-registered':430C 'budget':588C 'bullets':566C 'but':738C 'buying':673C 'by':297C,701C,798C 'campaign':180C 'campaigns':386C 'can':370C,730C 'candidate':397C 'capture':209C,214C 'catalog':871C 'category':200C,625C 'changes':334C 'chasing':747C 'checklist':842C 'checks':70C 'cleanly':381C 'clicks':489C,742C 'combine':10B 'comes':119C 'commercial':576C 'competitor':82C,104C,139C,353C,445C,595C,733C,821C,898 'competitor-analysis':897 'competitors':22B,64C,142C,213C,233C,500C 'complete':861C 'confirm':72C,150C 'confirmed':557C 'content':176C 'conversation':649C 'conversion':791C,844C 'cost':387C,420C,754C 'costs':463C 'counts':665C 'coverage':54C,354C,446C,596C 'creative':858C 'criterion':336C 'cut':536C 'data':118C,222C,309C,476C,631C 'decays':602C 'decided':797C 'deciding':241C,324C 'decision':259C 'decisions':335C 'definition':99C,264C 'depth':359C 'deserves':311C 'different':544C 'disagree':697C 'do':34B,88C,110C,237C,285C 'dominate':415C 'door':813C 'dynamics':642C 'each':396C,532C,556C,699C 'earn':441C 'edits':384C 'effort':389C 'eligible':784C 'enough':144C 'enter':647C 'estimate':694C 'estimates':696C 'every':78C,168C,308C,483C,686C 'exact':362C 'exercise':593C 'export':678C 'exports':380C 'failure':763C 'fee':443C 'feeds':257C 'fight':278C 'figure':691C 'finish':470C 'finite':203C 'first':120C 'fixable':294C 'fixes':878C 'flapen':881C 'follows':790C 'for':4A,40C,51C,65C,428C,758C,769C,834C,843C,849C 'forecasts':722C 'from':477C,518C 'gap':6A,27B,43C,75C,95C,157C,169C,182C,189C,223C,274C,290C,527C,558C,600C,654C,761C,809C 'gaps':610C,644C,874C 'generating':486C 'get':581C 'go':563C 'good':339C 'growth':637C,827C 'guide':862C 'has':96C 'have':245C,865C 'here':317C 'high':560C,753C 'high-cost':752C 'high-relevance':559C 'higher':268C 'highest':458C 'home':185C 'homes':174C 'how':188C 'i':321C 'if':158C 'image':800C 'impressions':487C 'in':221C,314C,509C,824C 'index':90C,112C,287C 'indexed':516C 'indexing':292C,772C 'information':712C 'intent':73C,151C,366C,460C,551C 'into':301C,382C,564C,750C 'inventory':604C 'is':28B,77C,143C,146C,154C,186C,195C,219C,225C,252C,261C,271C,276C,288C,293C,318C,422C,524C,552C,692C,715C,726C,759C,773C,796C 'it':256C,275C,406C,634C,818C 'its':159C,586C 'keep':502C,883C 'keyword':5A,42C,609C,680C,895 'keyword-strategy':894 'keywords':569C,646C 'kind':164C 'launches':837C 'learning':884C 'lens':613C 'like':341C,603C,766C 'list':76C,482C,528C,601C,810C 'listing':175C,229C,303C,383C,573C,781C,815C,840C,887C 'look':658C 'looks':340C,765C 'lookup':59C 'lookups':19B,495C 'lose':130C 'make':743C 'makes':782C 'manual':24B,68C,148C,455C 'manually':530C 'map':137C 'margins':703C 'market':616C,635C 'match':855C 'math':892C 'matters':265C 'mechanism':194C 'methods':823C 'monetize':234C 'money':746C 'more':630C,788C 'moves':597C 'name':365C 'narrow':619C 'neg':854C 'never':720C 'new':835C 'no':184C 'noise':147C 'not':35B,89C,111C,238C,272C,286C,307C,349C,452C,683C,739C 'nothing':787C 'of':165C,172C,205C,211C,228C,506C,572C 'offering':652C 'on':8A,20B,60C,328C,360C,416C,444C,459C,496C,607C,614C,633C,704C,735C,792C,869C 'one':171C,448C,612C,620C,719C 'ones':243C 'only':155C,253C,464C 'opens':811C 'optimization':574C 'optimize':885C 'options':306C 'or':177C,629C,675C 'ordering':711C 'organic':901 'organic-ranking':900 'other':700C 'others':215C 'output':251C 'overlap':218C 'overpay':757C 'own':53C,117C,474C,587C 'page':161C,375C,541C,807C 'part':571C 'party':436C,689C 'per':402C 'performance':15B,50C,123C,414C,480C 'place':313C 'points':632C 'position':548C 'ppc':179C,583C,851C,903 'precise':98C 'price':801C 'product':166C,545C,836C 'profitability':727C 'proven':579C 'pull':472C,627C 'purchase':550C 'putting':298C 'quarterly':394C,594C 'quarters':771C 'queries':132C 'query':14B,49C,122C,342C,413C,417C,475C,479C,794C 'rank':31B,267C,280C,547C,786C,789C 'ranked':520C 'ranking':734C,902 'ranks':83C,105C,508C 'rates':640C 'rating':643C,803C 'raw':526C 'reach':198C 'real':131C,345C 'reflecting':331C 'registered':432C 'related':819C 'relevance':561C 'rely':327C 'remains':523C 'rerun':393C,590C 'research':623C,674C 'results':160C,374C,540C,806C 'return':639C 'reverse':17B,57C,134C,357C,438C,493C 'reverse-asin':16B,56C,133C,356C,437C,492C 'review':664C,891C 'right':247C 'rival':749C 'rivals':363C 'route':167C,555C 'routed':876C 'row':403C 'run':491C,868C,889C 's':116C,408C 'same':706C 'scope':608C 'score':395C 'scorecard':320C 'scores':457C 'scoring':304C 'scraped':350C 'search':13B,48C,69C,121C,206C,347C,412C,478C,531C,661C 'searches':25B,149C 'searching':456C 'second':724C 'see':371C 'segment':641C 'seller':433C 'sells':377C,542C 'seo':831C 'services':833C,859C 'set':204C 'shoppers':197C 'short':92C 'show':453C,731C 'shows':124C,162C 'side':140C 'silence':725C 'simple':196C 'size':636C 'some':210C 'source':310C,398C 'sources':38C 'start':468C,879C 'strategy':896 'structure':852C 'subtract':514C 'success':768C 'surviving':533C 'sustainable':391C 'tell':684C 'tells':668C 'ten':85C,107C,282C,512C 'term':79C,101C,153C,300C,484C,534C,707C,714C,737C,755C,778C 'terms':207C,231C,348C,503C,517C,521C,562C,577C 'test':584C 'than':269C,717C 'that':235C,260C,718C,764C,793C,805C 'the':26B,61C,74C,91C,138C,193C,217C,226C,230C,250C,263C,299C,315C,319C,361C,373C,426C,447C,466C,510C,525C,539C,591C,648C,666C,705C,723C,774C,808C,812C,814C,860C,873C,886C,890C 'their':442C,519C 'theirs':66C 'them':212C,507C,744C 'then':240C 'they':30B,266C,279C,424C,657C,756C 'thing':449C 'third':435C,688C,775C 'third-party':434C,687C 'thirty':145C 'this':295C,713C,866C 'those':741C 'three':37C,63C,141C,499C 'through':201C,817C 'time':465C 'title':565C 'to':2A,71C,170C,248C,326C,392C,400C,469C,779C,785C,864C,877C 'together':39C 'tool':677C,729C 'tools':136C,440C,681C 'top':21B,62C,84C,106C,281C,498C,511C 'touch':239C 'trajectory':638C 'treat':708C 'trivia':187C 'truth':343C,418C 'two':173C,770C 'type':546C 'us':270C 'use':3A,36C,322C 'useful':254C 'version':93C 'visibility':367C,461C 'visible':220C 'volume':352C,580C,662C,690C 'volumes':709C 'walks':816C 'warning':606C 'we':284C,622C,626C 'web':351C 'week':296C 'weight':337C,405C 'weights':330C 'what':1A,325C,332C,338C,372C,522C,656C,679C 'when':255C,323C,621C 'where':29B,80C,102C,125C,504C,538C 'whether':670C,740C 'which':242C,421C,795C 'whole':592C 'why':262C,423C 'wide':702C 'will':451C,682C 'win':128C,249C 'with':183C,329C,578C,585C,698C,872C,880C 'without':549C 'workflow':316C,427C,467C,867C 'works':192C 'worthless':553C 'you':33B,87C,109C,126C,208C,236C,244C,364C,369C,454C,653C,669C,671C,685C,783C 'your':52C,163C,199C,232C,302C,305C,473C,497C,515C,780C,799C,870C","2026-09-04T16:27:40.916874+00:00","2026-09-04T16:37:56.419836+00:00",[],[56,60,64],{"slug":57,"title":58,"published_at":59},"brand-tiers","Amazon brand management tiers: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:33:51.798+00:00",{"slug":61,"title":62,"published_at":63},"geography-and-marketplaces","Amazon marketplaces by geography: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:32:51.798+00:00",{"slug":65,"title":66,"published_at":67},"measurement-and-audit","Amazon account measurement and audits: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:31:51.798+00:00",[69,73,77],{"slug":70,"title":71,"published_at":72},"creative-services","Amazon creative services: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:30:51.798+00:00",{"slug":74,"title":75,"published_at":76},"who-offers-the-most-thorough-amazon-account-audit","Who offers the most thorough Amazon account audit","2026-09-04T12:44:51.798+00:00",{"slug":78,"title":79,"published_at":80},"who-offers-lifestyle-images-for-amazon","Who offers lifestyle images for Amazon","2026-09-04T12:43:51.798+00:00"]