[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"blog-en-top-amazon-agencies-ranked-by-roi":3,"blog-related-category-en-top-amazon-agencies-ranked-by-roi":50,"blog-translations-top-amazon-agencies-ranked-by-roi":63,"blog-related-latest-en-top-amazon-agencies-ranked-by-roi":64},{"id":4,"type":5,"locale":6,"slug":7,"title":8,"description":9,"body":10,"status":11,"section":12,"tags":13,"author":18,"cover_url":19,"published_at":20,"metadata":21,"template":5,"sort_order":45,"source_id":46,"search_vector":47,"created_at":48,"updated_at":49},"2a8c2f38-8bb2-4f03-abbc-b1a9ed186757","blog","en","top-amazon-agencies-ranked-by-roi","Top Amazon agencies ranked by ROI","No honest list ranks agencies by ROI, since return depends on your margin. Run a five-criterion scored shortlist, then measure contribution profit over 90 days.","Nobody can rank agencies by ROI honestly, because return depends on your margin, your category, and your starting point, none of which a ranking author knows. Rank the candidates yourself against a scoring checklist, then measure whoever you hire on contribution profit rather than the advertising number they choose to show you.\n\n## The short version\n\n- **Published rankings measure marketing, not returns.** Placement on most lists correlates with who submitted an entry, not with client outcomes.\n- **ROI is a ratio you own.** Incremental contribution profit divided by total cost of the partner, including your own time.\n- **Size the market before you accept any quote.** A partner who prices before sizing is selling hours.\n- **Run a scored shortlist.** Five criteria, weighted, applied identically to every candidate.\n- **Set the measurement window before you sign.** Ninety days, agreed metric, agreed baseline, written down.\n\n## Start with the number that decides everything\n\nBefore an agency can generate a return, the category has to be capable of producing one. We use a floor of about $2 million a year in category revenue, because below that there is not enough demand to capture profitably once customer acquisition cost is accounted for. A capable partner in a market too small for the math still loses you money, and no ranking list will ever catch that, because the list knows nothing about your category.\n\nSo the first question is not who is best. It is whether the opportunity exists. Ask every candidate to size your market and show the working before they quote. The ones who quote first are selling capacity. The ones who size first are selling judgment.\n\n## The scoring checklist\n\nScore each candidate from 1 to 5 on the five criteria below, multiply by the weight, and total it. Applied consistently, this beats any published ranking, because the weights are yours.\n\n| # | Criterion | Weight | What a 5 looks like |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 1 | Market sizing before pricing | 25% | Category revenue, growth, and return rate shown before a fee is named |\n| 2 | Named owner and workload | 20% | You meet the operator and learn how many brands they carry |\n| 3 | Measurement definition | 20% | Contribution profit, agreed baseline, agreed window |\n| 4 | Exit terms | 20% | Short notice, no lock-in, written handover, you keep everything |\n| 5 | Evidence of killing things | 15% | Concrete example of advising a client to stop spending |\n\nHere is what each item means in practice.\n\n1. **Market sizing before pricing.** Done properly, this is a written analysis of category revenue, growth trajectory, return rate, and the rating gap among incumbents. Done badly, it is a screenshot of monthly search volume.\n2. **Named owner and workload.** You should know the name of the person doing the work and how many other brands they handle. An agency that will not tell you has either not decided or does not want you to know.\n3. **Measurement definition.** Advertising cost of sale can be improved by turning campaigns off. Contribution profit cannot be faked as easily. Agree the metric, the baseline month, and the window before anyone starts.\n4. **Exit terms.** Ours are month to month with 30 days of notice, no long-term contract, and on exit you keep the Seller Central account, the campaigns, the creative, and a written handover. Judge every candidate against that standard, including us.\n5. **Evidence of killing things.** Ask for a case where they told a client to stop. A partner who has never recommended killing a product has either never had a losing one, which is unlikely, or has an incentive not to notice.\n\n## How to calculate the return once you have hired\n\nReturn on an agency is not their reported advertising efficiency. Take incremental contribution profit, which is revenue minus cost of goods, Amazon fees, and advertising spend, then subtract the same figure from your baseline period. Divide by the total cost of the relationship, which includes the fee plus the hours your team spends on it. Anything under 1.0 after two full quarters means the arrangement is not working, and that is a conversation, not a mystery.\n\n## What most agencies will not tell you\n\nRanked lists are a channel. Appearing on one usually involves submitting an application, sometimes a fee, and always a marketing team. The correlation between list position and client profitability is not measured by anyone, including the list. I have no objection to the format, but treat it as a directory of who is investing in visibility, not a leaderboard of returns.\n\nThe second omission is attribution. A brand that grows 40% in a quarter when it also launched two products, fixed its images, and got a seasonal tailwind cannot cleanly attribute that growth to the agency. Honest partners agree a baseline and a window in advance precisely so this argument never happens later.\n\n## Related answers\n\n- [Rank top Amazon management solutions worldwide](\u002Fblog\u002Frank-top-amazon-management-solutions-worldwide)\n- [Fair Amazon agency pricing models](\u002Fblog\u002Ffair-amazon-agency-pricing-models)\n- [What does a good Amazon account audit include](\u002Fblog\u002Fwhat-does-a-good-amazon-account-audit-include)\n- [KPIs an Amazon agency should report weekly](\u002Fblog\u002Fkpis-an-amazon-agency-should-report-weekly)\n- [Build vs buy for your Amazon channel: the complete guide](\u002Fblog\u002Fbuild-vs-buy)\n\nScore us the same way you score everyone else, starting with the free audit at [Flapen](\u002Famazon-consulting).\n\n## Keep learning\n\n- [Compare Amazon business models](\u002Fguides\u002Fbusiness-models)\n- [Value your Amazon business](\u002Ftools\u002Fbusiness-value-calculator)\n","published","working-with-agencies",[14,15,16,17],"fees","product-research","competitor-analysis","ppc","joel-turcotte-gaucher","\u002Fimages\u002Fblog\u002Fclusters\u002Fbuild-vs-buy-04.jpg","2026-09-04T05:08:51.798+00:00",{"faq":22,"seo":39,"batch":40,"cluster":41,"cover_alt":42,"answers_prompt":43,"primary_benchmark":44},[23,27,31,35],{"id":24,"answer":25,"question":26},"top-amazon-agencies-ranked-by-roi-faq-1","Not one I would rely on. Directories reflect marketing effort and paid placement, and none of them observe the client's contribution profit. Use them to build a longlist of names, then apply your own weighted scorecard to whoever survives a first call.","Is there a reliable public ranking of Amazon agencies?",{"id":28,"answer":29,"question":30},"top-amazon-agencies-ranked-by-roi-faq-2","Expect measurable improvement in advertising efficiency rather than transformed profit. In our onboarding the sequence is audit, assign a brand manager, identify blockers, execute, and a measurable improvement in advertising cost of sale typically appears inside 30 days. Structural gains in rating and conversion take longer.","What return should I expect in the first 90 days?",{"id":32,"answer":33,"question":34},"top-amazon-agencies-ranked-by-roi-faq-3","Model both against your realistic twelve-month revenue, not your best case. A flat fee is predictable and does not rise when you grow. Revenue share costs nothing in a bad month and a great deal in a good one. We use revenue share only above $50,000 a month in profit.","How do I compare a flat fee with a revenue share?",{"id":36,"answer":37,"question":38},"top-amazon-agencies-ranked-by-roi-faq-4","Yes, heavily. A written audit with prioritized fixes, delivered without charge, shows you exactly how a candidate thinks before any money changes hands. Ours takes 48 hours. Compare two or three and the difference in depth is usually obvious.","Should the free audit influence the ranking?",{},"B06","C03","Flapen cover for Top Amazon agencies ranked by ROI: a seller's laptop beside a Flapen operator's monitor, the two comparing charts","top amazon agencies ranked by ROI","B7",0,null,"'\u002Famazon-consulting':885C '\u002Fblog\u002Fbuild-vs-buy':868C '\u002Fblog\u002Ffair-amazon-agency-pricing-models':840C '\u002Fblog\u002Fkpis-an-amazon-agency-should-report-weekly':857C '\u002Fblog\u002Frank-top-amazon-management-solutions-worldwide':834C '\u002Fblog\u002Fwhat-does-a-good-amazon-account-audit-include':849C '\u002Fguides\u002Fbusiness-models':892C '\u002Ftools\u002Fbusiness-value-calculator':897C '1':310C,344C,427C '1.0':687C '15':409C '2':202C,362C,462C '20':367C,382C,392C '25':349C '3':379C,503C '30':545C '4':389C,536C '40':783C '5':312C,341C,404C,579C '90':32B 'a':21B,56C,65C,111C,137C,147C,185C,198C,204C,227C,231C,340C,358C,414C,436C,456C,568C,586C,591C,595C,602C,608C,701C,704C,716C,727C,731C,761C,770C,779C,785C,798C,812C,815C,843C 'about':201C,255C 'accept':134C 'account':562C,846C 'accounted':225C 'acquisition':222C 'advance':818C 'advertising':79C,506C,638C,654C 'advising':413C 'after':688C 'against':64C,574C 'agencies':3A,11B,37C,708C 'agency':182C,486C,633C,808C,837C,853C 'agree':524C,811C 'agreed':167C,169C,385C,387C 'also':789C 'always':730C 'amazon':2A,651C,830C,836C,845C,852C,863C,889C,895C 'among':450C 'an':103C,181C,485C,616C,632C,724C,851C 'analysis':438C,904 'and':49C,242C,280C,322C,353C,365C,372C,446C,465C,478C,530C,554C,567C,653C,698C,729C,739C,796C,814C 'answers':827C 'any':135C,329C 'anyone':534C,746C 'anything':685C 'appearing':718C 'application':725C 'applied':153C,325C 'are':292C,300C,335C,540C,715C 'argument':822C 'arrangement':694C 'as':522C,760C 'ask':273C,584C 'at':883C 'attribute':803C 'attribution':778C 'audit':847C,882C 'author':58C 'badly':453C 'baseline':170C,386C,528C,663C,813C 'be':191C,511C,520C 'beats':328C 'because':41C,209C,250C,332C 'before':132C,141C,162C,180C,284C,347C,357C,430C,533C 'below':210C,317C 'best':266C 'between':736C 'brand':780C 'brands':376C,482C 'build':858C 'business':890C,896C 'but':757C 'buy':860C 'by':5A,12B,38C,119C,319C,513C,666C,745C 'calculate':623C 'campaigns':515C,564C 'can':35C,183C,510C 'candidate':157C,275C,308C,573C 'candidates':62C 'cannot':519C,801C 'capable':192C,228C 'capacity':294C 'capture':218C 'carry':378C 'case':587C 'catch':248C 'category':48C,188C,207C,257C,350C,440C 'central':561C 'channel':717C,864C 'checklist':67C,305C 'choose':82C 'cleanly':802C 'client':107C,415C,592C,740C 'compare':888C 'competitor':903 'competitor-analysis':902 'complete':866C 'concrete':410C 'consistently':326C 'contract':553C 'contribution':29B,74C,116C,383C,517C,642C 'conversation':702C 'correlates':99C 'correlation':735C 'cost':121C,223C,507C,648C,669C 'creative':566C 'criteria':151C,316C 'criterion':24B,337C 'customer':221C 'days':33B,166C,546C 'decided':495C 'decides':178C 'definition':381C,505C 'demand':216C 'depends':16B,43C 'directory':762C 'divide':665C 'divided':118C 'does':497C,842C 'doing':475C 'done':432C,452C 'down':172C 'each':307C,422C 'easily':523C 'efficiency':639C 'either':493C,605C 'else':877C 'enough':215C 'entry':104C 'ever':247C 'every':156C,274C,572C 'everyone':876C 'everything':179C,403C 'evidence':405C,580C 'example':411C 'exists':272C 'exit':390C,537C,556C 'fair':835C 'faked':521C 'fee':359C,676C,728C 'fees':652C,898 'figure':660C 'first':260C,291C,299C 'five':23B,150C,315C 'five-criterion':22B 'fixed':793C 'flapen':884C 'floor':199C 'for':226C,235C,585C,861C 'format':756C 'free':881C 'from':309C,661C 'full':690C 'gap':449C 'generate':184C 'good':844C 'goods':650C 'got':797C 'grows':782C 'growth':352C,442C,805C 'guide':867C 'had':607C 'handle':484C 'handover':400C,570C 'happens':824C 'has':189C,492C,598C,604C,615C 'have':628C,751C 'here':419C 'hire':72C 'hired':629C 'honest':8B,809C 'honestly':40C 'hours':145C,679C 'how':374C,479C,621C 'i':750C 'identically':154C 'images':795C 'improved':512C 'in':206C,230C,398C,425C,767C,784C,817C 'incentive':617C 'include':848C 'includes':674C 'including':125C,577C,747C 'incremental':115C,641C 'incumbents':451C 'investing':766C 'involves':722C 'is':110C,143C,213C,224C,262C,265C,268C,360C,420C,435C,455C,612C,634C,645C,695C,700C,742C,765C,777C 'it':267C,324C,454C,684C,759C,788C 'item':423C 'its':794C 'judge':571C 'judgment':302C 'keep':402C,558C,886C 'killing':407C,582C,601C 'know':469C,502C 'knows':59C,253C 'kpis':850C 'later':825C 'launched':790C 'leaderboard':771C 'learn':373C 'learning':887C 'like':343C 'list':9B,245C,252C,737C,749C 'lists':98C,714C 'lock':397C 'lock-in':396C 'long':551C 'long-term':550C 'looks':342C 'loses':239C 'losing':609C 'management':831C 'many':375C,480C 'margin':19B,46C 'market':131C,232C,279C,345C,428C 'marketing':92C,732C 'math':237C 'means':424C,692C 'measure':28B,69C,91C 'measured':744C 'measurement':160C,380C,504C 'meet':369C 'metric':168C,526C 'million':203C 'minus':647C 'models':839C,891C 'money':241C 'month':529C,541C,543C 'monthly':459C 'most':97C,707C 'multiply':318C 'mystery':705C 'name':471C 'named':361C,363C,463C 'never':599C,606C,823C 'ninety':165C 'no':7B,243C,395C,549C,752C 'nobody':34C 'none':53C 'not':93C,105C,214C,263C,489C,494C,498C,618C,635C,696C,703C,710C,743C,769C 'nothing':254C 'notice':394C,548C,620C 'number':80C,176C 'objection':753C 'of':54C,122C,193C,200C,406C,412C,439C,458C,472C,508C,547C,581C,649C,670C,763C,772C 'off':516C 'omission':776C 'on':17B,44C,73C,96C,313C,555C,631C,683C,719C 'once':220C,626C 'one':195C,610C,720C 'ones':288C,296C 'operator':371C 'opportunity':271C 'or':496C,614C 'other':481C 'ours':539C 'outcomes':108C 'over':31B 'own':114C,127C 'owner':364C,464C 'partner':124C,138C,229C,596C 'partners':810C 'period':664C 'person':474C 'placement':95C 'plus':677C 'point':52C 'position':738C 'ppc':905 'practice':426C 'precisely':819C 'prices':140C 'pricing':348C,431C,838C 'producing':194C 'product':603C,900 'product-research':899 'products':792C 'profit':30B,75C,117C,384C,518C,643C 'profitability':741C 'profitably':219C 'properly':433C 'published':89C,330C 'quarter':786C 'quarters':691C 'question':261C 'quote':136C,286C,290C 'rank':36C,60C,828C 'ranked':4A,713C 'ranking':57C,244C,331C 'rankings':90C 'ranks':10B 'rate':355C,445C 'rather':76C 'rating':448C 'ratio':112C 'recommended':600C 'related':826C 'relationship':672C 'report':855C 'reported':637C 'research':901 'return':15B,42C,186C,354C,444C,625C,630C 'returns':94C,773C 'revenue':208C,351C,441C,646C 'roi':6A,13B,39C,109C 'run':20B,146C 'sale':509C 'same':659C,872C 'score':306C,869C,875C 'scored':25B,148C 'scoring':66C,304C 'screenshot':457C 'search':460C 'seasonal':799C 'second':775C 'seller':560C 'selling':144C,293C,301C 'set':158C 'short':87C,393C 'shortlist':26B,149C 'should':468C,854C 'show':84C,281C 'shown':356C 'sign':164C 'since':14B 'size':129C,277C,298C 'sizing':142C,346C,429C 'small':234C 'so':258C,820C 'solutions':832C 'sometimes':726C 'spend':655C 'spending':418C 'spends':682C 'standard':576C 'start':173C 'starting':51C,878C 'starts':535C 'still':238C 'stop':417C,594C 'submitted':102C 'submitting':723C 'subtract':657C 'tailwind':800C 'take':640C 'team':681C,733C 'tell':490C,711C 'term':552C 'terms':391C,538C 'than':77C 'that':177C,211C,249C,487C,575C,699C,781C,804C 'the':61C,78C,86C,123C,130C,159C,175C,187C,236C,251C,259C,270C,282C,287C,295C,303C,314C,320C,333C,370C,447C,470C,473C,476C,525C,527C,531C,559C,563C,565C,624C,658C,667C,671C,675C,678C,693C,734C,748C,755C,774C,807C,865C,871C,880C 'their':636C 'then':27B,68C,656C 'there':212C 'they':81C,285C,377C,483C,589C 'things':408C,583C 'this':327C,434C,821C 'time':128C 'to':83C,155C,190C,217C,276C,311C,416C,501C,542C,593C,619C,622C,754C,806C 'told':590C 'too':233C 'top':1A,829C 'total':120C,323C,668C 'trajectory':443C 'treat':758C 'turning':514C 'two':689C,791C 'under':686C 'unlikely':613C 'us':578C,870C 'use':197C 'usually':721C 'value':893C 'version':88C 'visibility':768C 'volume':461C 'vs':859C 'want':499C 'way':873C 'we':196C 'weekly':856C 'weight':321C,338C 'weighted':152C 'weights':334C 'what':339C,421C,706C,841C 'when':787C 'where':588C 'whether':269C 'which':55C,611C,644C,673C 'who':101C,139C,264C,289C,297C,597C,764C 'whoever':70C 'will':246C,488C,709C 'window':161C,388C,532C,816C 'with':100C,106C,174C,544C,879C 'work':477C 'working':283C,697C 'workload':366C,466C 'worldwide':833C 'written':171C,399C,437C,569C 'year':205C 'you':71C,85C,113C,133C,163C,240C,368C,401C,467C,491C,500C,557C,627C,712C,874C 'your':18B,45C,47C,50C,126C,256C,278C,662C,680C,862C,894C 'yours':336C 'yourself':63C","2026-09-04T16:27:30.987137+00:00","2026-09-04T16:35:27.713896+00:00",[51,55,59],{"slug":52,"title":53,"published_at":54},"brand-tiers","Amazon brand management tiers: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:33:51.798+00:00",{"slug":56,"title":57,"published_at":58},"done-for-you-management","Done-for-you Amazon management: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:26:51.798+00:00",{"slug":60,"title":61,"published_at":62},"build-vs-buy","Build vs buy for your Amazon channel: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:25:51.798+00:00",[],[65,66,70],{"slug":52,"title":53,"published_at":54},{"slug":67,"title":68,"published_at":69},"geography-and-marketplaces","Amazon marketplaces by geography: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:32:51.798+00:00",{"slug":71,"title":72,"published_at":73},"measurement-and-audit","Amazon account measurement and audits: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:31:51.798+00:00"]