[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"blog-en-performance-based-amazon-agencies-list":3,"blog-related-category-en-performance-based-amazon-agencies-list":54,"blog-translations-performance-based-amazon-agencies-list":67,"blog-related-latest-en-performance-based-amazon-agencies-list":68},{"id":4,"type":5,"locale":6,"slug":7,"title":8,"description":9,"body":10,"status":11,"section":12,"tags":13,"author":18,"cover_url":19,"published_at":20,"metadata":21,"template":5,"sort_order":49,"source_id":50,"search_vector":51,"created_at":52,"updated_at":53},"465a23ab-57e5-4745-857c-4da1358f626d","blog","en","performance-based-amazon-agencies-list","Performance-based Amazon agencies list","Sort the three models behind the performance-based label before shortlisting. Percentage of ad spend tracks your budget, and revenue share needs scale.","Judge the structure before you shortlist the firms. \"Performance-based\" covers three very\ndifferent models with different incentives, and one of them, percentage of ad spend, is\nperformance-linked in name only. Establish which model you are being offered before comparing\nanyone.\n\n## The short version\n\n- **Three models hide behind one label.** They behave very differently.\n- **Percentage of ad spend is not performance pricing.** It tracks your budget.\n- **Revenue share aligns better** but only works at scale.\n- **Reduced base plus bonus** is the most workable hybrid.\n- **Ask what the baseline is and who measured it.**\n\n## The three models called performance-based\n\nI run Flapen with 50 operators managing about 70 brands. We charge a flat fee below\n$50,000 a month in profit and revenue share above it, so I have operated on both sides of this.\n\n| Model | What it tracks | Actual incentive |\n|---|---|---|\n| Percentage of ad spend | Your budget | Spend more |\n| Percentage of revenue | Your sales | Grow sales, including unprofitably |\n| Reduced base plus bonus | The agreed metric | Whatever metric you chose |\n\nOnly the third is performance pricing, and only if the metric is right.\n\n### Percentage of ad spend\n\nThe most common and the least defensible. Your goal is the lowest cost of customer acquisition\nyou can achieve. Their revenue rises with your budget. Those point in opposite directions.\n\nThe conflict is invisible in a good quarter and decisive in a bad one, because when a product\nis failing the correct advice is usually to cut spend and fix conversion first.\n\n### Percentage of revenue\n\nBetter aligned, with two conditions. It needs an efficiency floor, otherwise the agency can\nhit its number by pushing spend with your budget. And it punishes foundational work: if your\nlisting needs rebuilding before revenue can move, a revenue-share agency spends months earning\nlittle for the work that matters most.\n\nWe offer it above $50,000 a month in profit, at 10 to 20 percent, because below that the\nvolatility is unfair to whichever side is unlucky.\n\n### Reduced base plus bonus\n\nThe workable hybrid. A lower fixed fee covers operating cost and a bonus rewards a defined\noutcome.\n\nThe whole design decision is the metric. Contribution margin after ad spend and cost of\ncustomer acquisition at held volume both work and neither can be gamed. Revenue can be bought\nwith your own budget. ACoS alone improves when you stop spending.\n\n## What to ask any performance-priced candidate\n\n1. **Which of the three models is this, precisely?**\n2. **What is the baseline, and who measured it?**\n3. **What happens in a bad quarter?**\n4. **What happens when the right call is to reduce spend?**\n5. **Do kill criteria override the bonus?**\n\nQuestion two catches the most common weakness. A bonus paid against a baseline the agency set\nfor itself is not a performance structure, it is a target they chose.\n\nQuestion five is the one nobody asks. Every performance structure creates pressure to keep a\nfailing product alive, because a dead product earns nothing. Write in that stopping a product\nmust not cost the agency its upside.\n\n## Why a flat fee is often better\n\nWorth saying plainly, since I charge one.\n\nA flat fee is the only structure where nobody in the room earns more by spending more of your\nmoney. Ours runs $800 a month for one product up to $2,400 for five, and it does not move when\nI recommend cutting spend or killing a product.\n\nEvery performance structure buys a share of risk and pays for it with a share of neutrality.\nThe advice you most need is the advice that reduces the agency's earnings, and each layer of\nperformance pay makes that advice more expensive for them to give.\n\n## What most agencies will not tell you\n\nThe label is doing a lot of work. \"Performance-based\" sounds like shared risk and is most\ncommonly implemented as percentage of ad spend, which shares nothing and tracks the volume of\nyour money moved.\n\nAsk the direct test question: what happens to your income if I halve my ad spend. A flat fee\nproduces no change. Percentage of spend produces a proportional fall, which tells you exactly\nwhere the alignment sits.\n\nThe other thing: performance pricing is easiest to sell to sellers who have been burned by a\nretainer that delivered little. That is an understandable reaction and it frequently trades one\nproblem for a subtler one.\n\n## Related answers\n\n- [Alternatives to pay-for-performance Amazon management](\u002Fblog\u002Falternatives-to-pay-for-performance-amazon-management)\n- [Fair Amazon agency pricing models](\u002Fblog\u002Ffair-amazon-agency-pricing-models)\n- [What to ask about fee structure vs ad spend](\u002Fblog\u002Fwhat-to-ask-about-fee-structure-vs-ad-spend)\n- [How to structure bonuses tied to Amazon revenue](\u002Fblog\u002Fhow-to-structure-bonuses-tied-to-amazon-revenue)\n- [Hiring an Amazon agency: the complete guide](\u002Fblog\u002Fhiring-an-agency)\n\nHalve your ad spend and our invoice does not move. Pricing is published at [Flapen](\u002Famazon-consulting).\n\n## Keep learning\n\n- [Compare Amazon business models](\u002Fguides\u002Fbusiness-models)\n- [Value your Amazon business](\u002Ftools\u002Fbusiness-value-calculator)\n","published","working-with-agencies",[14,15,16,17],"fees","ppc","amazon-fba","private-label","joel-turcotte-gaucher","\u002Fimages\u002Fblog\u002Fclusters\u002Fhiring-an-agency-03.jpg","2026-09-04T01:38:51.798+00:00",{"faq":22,"seo":43,"batch":44,"cluster":45,"cover_alt":46,"answers_prompt":47,"primary_benchmark":48},[23,27,31,35,39],{"id":24,"answer":25,"question":26},"performance-based-amazon-agencies-list-faq-1","No. It tracks the volume of your budget rather than any outcome, and it pays the agency more when you spend more, which conflicts directly with lowering your cost of customer acquisition.","Is percentage of ad spend performance pricing?",{"id":28,"answer":29,"question":30},"performance-based-amazon-agencies-list-faq-2","Above about $50,000 a month in profit, with an efficiency floor attached. Below that, volatility makes it unfair to one side, and it penalizes the foundational work that precedes revenue movement.","When does revenue share make sense?",{"id":32,"answer":33,"question":34},"performance-based-amazon-agencies-list-faq-3","Contribution margin after ad spend, or cost of customer acquisition at held volume. Both resist gaming. Revenue can be bought with your own budget and ACoS improves when you stop spending.","What is the best bonus metric?",{"id":36,"answer":37,"question":38},"performance-based-amazon-agencies-list-faq-4","A kill-criteria override, so that recommending a product be stopped does not cost the agency its bonus. Without it, every performance structure quietly funds keeping failures alive.","What is the clause everyone forgets?",{"id":40,"answer":41,"question":42},"performance-based-amazon-agencies-list-faq-5","What happens to your income if I halve my ad spend. A flat fee produces no change. Percentage of spend produces a proportional fall, which tells you exactly where the alignment sits. Ours runs $800 a month for one product up to $2,400 for five and does not move when I recommend cutting spend or killing a product, because a flat fee is the only structure where nobody earns more by spending more of your money.","What is the direct test question for any fee structure?",{},"B02","C01","Flapen cover for Performance-based Amazon agencies list: a Flapen operator showing a client a sales chart beside an open proposal binder","performance-based amazon agencies list","B1",0,null,"'\u002Famazon-consulting':828C '\u002Fblog\u002Falternatives-to-pay-for-performance-amazon-management':779C '\u002Fblog\u002Ffair-amazon-agency-pricing-models':785C '\u002Fblog\u002Fhiring-an-agency':812C '\u002Fblog\u002Fhow-to-structure-bonuses-tied-to-amazon-revenue':804C '\u002Fblog\u002Fwhat-to-ask-about-fee-structure-vs-ad-spend':795C '\u002Fguides\u002Fbusiness-models':835C '\u002Ftools\u002Fbusiness-value-calculator':840C '000':151C,343C '1':436C '10':349C '2':445C,589C '20':351C '3':454C '4':461C '400':590C '5':472C '50':138C,150C,342C '70':142C '800':581C 'a':146C,152C,256C,262C,267C,323C,344C,372C,380C,383C,458C,486C,490C,499C,504C,522C,527C,536C,546C,559C,582C,605C,611C,620C,664C,712C,722C,749C,766C 'about':141C,789C 'above':159C,341C 'achieve':239C 'acos':421C 'acquisition':236C,402C 'actual':174C 'ad':21B,56C,90C,178C,219C,396C,683C,710C,793C,815C 'advice':273C,625C,631C,646C 'after':395C 'against':489C 'agencies':5A,655C 'agency':298C,327C,493C,542C,635C,782C,808C 'agreed':198C 'aligned':287C 'alignment':731C 'aligns':102C 'alive':525C 'alone':422C 'alternatives':771C 'amazon':4A,777C,781C,802C,807C,832C,838C,844 'amazon-fba':843 'an':293C,756C,806C 'and':26B,50C,123C,156C,210C,224C,259C,279C,309C,379C,398C,408C,450C,593C,615C,638C,675C,688C,759C,817C 'answers':770C 'any':431C 'anyone':74C 'are':69C 'as':680C 'ask':118C,430C,696C,788C 'asks':514C 'at':107C,348C,403C,826C 'bad':263C,459C 'base':110C,194C,366C 'based':3A,15B,41C,133C,670C 'baseline':121C,449C,491C 'be':411C,415C 'because':265C,353C,526C 'been':746C 'before':17B,34C,72C,319C 'behave':85C 'behind':11B,81C 'being':70C 'below':149C,354C 'better':103C,286C,551C 'bonus':112C,196C,368C,381C,478C,487C 'bonuses':799C 'both':166C,406C 'bought':416C 'brands':143C 'budget':25B,99C,181C,245C,308C,420C 'burned':747C 'business':833C,839C 'but':104C 'buys':610C 'by':303C,573C,748C 'call':467C 'called':130C 'can':238C,299C,321C,410C,414C 'candidate':435C 'catches':481C 'change':717C 'charge':145C,557C 'chose':203C,507C 'common':223C,484C 'commonly':678C 'compare':831C 'comparing':73C 'complete':810C 'conditions':290C 'conflict':252C 'contribution':393C 'conversion':281C 'correct':272C 'cost':233C,378C,399C,540C 'covers':42C,376C 'creates':518C 'criteria':475C 'customer':235C,401C 'cut':277C 'cutting':601C 'dead':528C 'decision':389C 'decisive':260C 'defensible':227C 'defined':384C 'delivered':752C 'design':388C 'different':45C,48C 'differently':87C 'direct':698C 'directions':250C 'do':473C 'does':595C,820C 'doing':663C 'each':639C 'earning':330C 'earnings':637C 'earns':530C,571C 'easiest':739C 'efficiency':294C 'establish':65C 'every':515C,607C 'exactly':728C 'expensive':648C 'failing':270C,523C 'fair':780C 'fall':724C 'fba':845 'fee':148C,375C,548C,561C,714C,790C 'fees':841 'firms':38C 'first':282C 'five':509C,592C 'fix':280C 'fixed':374C 'flapen':136C,827C 'flat':147C,547C,560C,713C 'floor':295C 'for':332C,495C,584C,591C,617C,649C,765C,775C 'foundational':312C 'frequently':761C 'gamed':412C 'give':652C 'goal':229C 'good':257C 'grow':189C 'guide':811C 'halve':708C,813C 'happens':456C,463C,702C 'have':163C,745C 'held':404C 'hide':80C 'hiring':805C 'hit':300C 'how':796C 'hybrid':117C,371C 'i':134C,162C,556C,599C,707C 'if':212C,314C,706C 'implemented':679C 'improves':423C 'in':62C,154C,248C,255C,261C,346C,457C,533C,568C 'incentive':175C 'incentives':49C 'including':191C 'income':705C 'invisible':254C 'invoice':819C 'is':58C,92C,113C,122C,207C,215C,230C,253C,269C,274C,358C,363C,390C,442C,447C,468C,497C,503C,510C,549C,562C,629C,662C,676C,738C,755C,824C 'it':96C,126C,160C,172C,291C,310C,340C,453C,502C,594C,618C,760C 'its':301C,543C 'itself':496C 'judge':31C 'keep':521C,829C 'kill':474C 'killing':604C 'label':16B,83C,661C,848 'layer':640C 'learning':830C 'least':226C 'like':672C 'linked':61C 'list':6A 'listing':316C 'little':331C,753C 'lot':665C 'lower':373C 'lowest':232C 'makes':644C 'management':778C 'managing':140C 'margin':394C 'matters':336C 'measured':125C,452C 'metric':199C,201C,214C,392C 'model':67C,170C 'models':10B,46C,79C,129C,441C,784C,834C 'money':578C,694C 'month':153C,345C,583C 'months':329C 'more':183C,572C,575C,647C 'most':115C,222C,337C,483C,627C,654C,677C 'move':322C,597C,822C 'moved':695C 'must':538C 'my':709C 'name':63C 'need':628C 'needs':29B,292C,317C 'neither':409C 'neutrality':623C 'no':716C 'nobody':513C,567C 'not':93C,498C,539C,596C,657C,821C 'nothing':531C,687C 'number':302C 'of':20B,52C,55C,89C,168C,177C,185C,218C,234C,284C,400C,438C,576C,613C,622C,641C,666C,682C,692C,719C 'offer':339C 'offered':71C 'often':550C 'on':165C 'one':51C,82C,264C,512C,558C,585C,763C,768C 'only':64C,105C,204C,211C,564C 'operated':164C 'operating':377C 'operators':139C 'opposite':249C 'or':603C 'other':734C 'otherwise':296C 'our':818C 'ours':579C 'outcome':385C 'override':476C 'own':419C 'paid':488C 'pay':643C,774C 'pay-for-performance':773C 'pays':616C 'percent':352C 'percentage':19B,54C,88C,176C,184C,217C,283C,681C,718C 'performance':2A,14B,40C,60C,94C,132C,208C,433C,500C,516C,608C,642C,669C,736C,776C 'performance-based':1A,13B,39C,131C,668C 'performance-linked':59C 'performance-priced':432C 'plainly':554C 'plus':111C,195C,367C 'point':247C 'ppc':842 'precisely':444C 'pressure':519C 'priced':434C 'pricing':95C,209C,737C,783C,823C 'private':847 'private-label':846 'problem':764C 'produces':715C,721C 'product':268C,524C,529C,537C,586C,606C 'profit':155C,347C 'proportional':723C 'published':825C 'punishes':311C 'pushing':304C 'quarter':258C,460C 'question':479C,508C,700C 'reaction':758C 'rebuilding':318C 'recommend':600C 'reduce':470C 'reduced':109C,193C,365C 'reduces':633C 'related':769C 'retainer':750C 'revenue':27B,100C,157C,186C,241C,285C,320C,325C,413C,803C 'revenue-share':324C 'rewards':382C 'right':216C,466C 'rises':242C 'risk':614C,674C 'room':570C 'run':135C 'runs':580C 's':636C 'sales':188C,190C 'saying':553C 'scale':30B,108C 'sell':741C 'sellers':743C 'set':494C 'share':28B,101C,158C,326C,612C,621C 'shared':673C 'shares':686C 'short':76C 'shortlist':36C 'shortlisting':18B 'side':362C 'sides':167C 'since':555C 'sits':732C 'so':161C 'sort':7B 'sounds':671C 'spend':22B,57C,91C,179C,182C,220C,278C,305C,397C,471C,602C,684C,711C,720C,794C,816C 'spending':427C,574C 'spends':328C 'stop':426C 'stopping':535C 'structure':33C,501C,517C,565C,609C,791C,798C 'subtler':767C 'target':505C 'tell':658C 'tells':726C 'test':699C 'that':335C,355C,534C,632C,645C,751C,754C 'the':8B,12B,32C,37C,75C,114C,120C,127C,197C,205C,213C,221C,225C,231C,251C,271C,297C,333C,356C,369C,386C,391C,439C,448C,465C,477C,482C,492C,511C,541C,563C,569C,624C,630C,634C,660C,690C,697C,730C,733C,809C 'their':240C 'them':53C,650C 'they':84C,506C 'thing':735C 'third':206C 'this':169C,443C 'those':246C 'three':9B,43C,78C,128C,440C 'tied':800C 'to':276C,350C,360C,429C,469C,520C,588C,651C,703C,740C,742C,772C,787C,797C,801C 'tracks':23B,97C,173C,689C 'trades':762C 'two':289C,480C 'understandable':757C 'unfair':359C 'unlucky':364C 'unprofitably':192C 'up':587C 'upside':544C 'usually':275C 'value':836C 'version':77C 'very':44C,86C 'volatility':357C 'volume':405C,691C 'vs':792C 'we':144C,338C 'weakness':485C 'what':119C,171C,428C,446C,455C,462C,653C,701C,786C 'whatever':200C 'when':266C,424C,464C,598C 'where':566C,729C 'which':66C,437C,685C,725C 'whichever':361C 'who':124C,451C,744C 'whole':387C 'why':545C 'will':656C 'with':47C,137C,243C,288C,306C,417C,619C 'work':313C,334C,407C,667C 'workable':116C,370C 'works':106C 'worth':552C 'write':532C 'you':35C,68C,202C,237C,425C,626C,659C,727C 'your':24B,98C,180C,187C,228C,244C,307C,315C,418C,577C,693C,704C,814C,837C","2026-09-04T16:27:27.075028+00:00","2026-09-04T16:34:19.443794+00:00",[55,59,63],{"slug":56,"title":57,"published_at":58},"brand-tiers","Amazon brand management tiers: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:33:51.798+00:00",{"slug":60,"title":61,"published_at":62},"done-for-you-management","Done-for-you Amazon management: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:26:51.798+00:00",{"slug":64,"title":65,"published_at":66},"build-vs-buy","Build vs buy for your Amazon channel: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:25:51.798+00:00",[],[69,70,74],{"slug":56,"title":57,"published_at":58},{"slug":71,"title":72,"published_at":73},"geography-and-marketplaces","Amazon marketplaces by geography: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:32:51.798+00:00",{"slug":75,"title":76,"published_at":77},"measurement-and-audit","Amazon account measurement and audits: the complete guide","2026-09-04T16:31:51.798+00:00"]